Delivery in day(s): 5
Diploma in Business
Unit Number and Title
Unit 7 Business law
Business law provides guidelines for conducting of operational activities to existing and new organization for assurance of fairness. These provisions provide protection to the weaker party and to prevent unfair practices. Present unit 7 business law assignment solution is focused on provision of business law to provide appropriate recommendations for given case scenarios. It will include description of Sales of Goods Act, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Law of property Act, 1925, Consumer Protection Act 1987 and anti-competitive Act to support recommendation in given scenarios. Description will be supported by previous case law. In addition to this, rights and infringement will be described according to the Intellectual property valid Act.
Implied terms in the Sales of Goods Act 1979 are described in following sections-
Exceptions- In the following situation remedy will not be provided to Adam
Section 15- Sale by sample: Goods provided in the sale should be according to the representative sample shown at the time of formation of agreement (Rush, and Ottley, 2006). It should be free from defects. TV should be as per the sample in the showroom.
As per the legislation of UK transfer of property is governed by the Law of property Act, 1925 and Transfer of Property Act, 1882. According to these act, transfer of property can be defined as action whereby a living person conveys their property or possession to another living person in present or future (Middlemiss, 2012). As per the provision of this Act, corporate body and associations are covered in definition of living person. Provisions of transfer of property is as follow-
In the present situation it may be determined that Adam had purchased the TV for personal and professional use and hence the title and possession of the goods shall be in his name. Thereby, Adam will be regarded as the true owner of the TV.
Remedies of the seller (Miss Bianca)
Remedies of the buyer (Adam)
In the present case Adam is eligible to avail above described right as TV is not working well after three days. He can either claim for replacement or refund of amount.
Provisions of product liability are introduced by the Consumer Protection Act 1987. As per the description in the Act, claimant should satisfy following points for recovery of damages-
In the present case, faulty product was provided by Miss Bianca as it was not working properly after 3 days. Exclusion clause in the agreement will not be considered for relief as it unfair to the aggrieved party.
In UK credit agreements are governed by Consumer Credit Act, 1974. As per the Act, following agreements can be used by Claire for the purchase of new car of credit-
As per the above description, agreement of credit sale will be suitable for the Claire as in this she is required to pay monthly installments along with the interest (Kidner, and Richard. 2007). Moreover, possession will be transferred with the first monthly installment.
Rules of termination rights and default notices are governed by Section 77-79 of CCA 1974. According to these section debtor or hirer are entitled to avail a copy of original agreement along with the statement of payment. Creditor has right to terminate the agreement prior to the expiry date, however this should be supported by appropriate reason (Rush, and Ottley, 2006). If financial institution wants to terminate the agreement of Claire they should serve her proper default notice. Along with this, period of 14 days should be provided so can avail remedy for breach of agreement. Default notice is mandatory to provide in following scenarios-
As per the regulation of the Consumer Credit Act, 1983, default notice should cover all material information. In the present situation, if financial institution wants to terminate the agreement of Claire they should serve her proper default notice in which proper reasons, information of payable and other significant facts should be mentioned.
Agency can be defined as connection of two parties where one party impliedly or expressly provides their consent to other party to act on their behalf. Description of types of agent is as follow-
Factors: the agents that have the right to make offer, purchase goods or raise cash on behalf of the principal are called factors and are regulated by the Factors Act, 1889.
Brokers: Brokers are known for utilizing their position in order to provide the best deal for the transfer of the property for a certain remuneration. The process is called brokerage. Unlike factors brokers don’t have the ownership of the goods so being transferred.
Del Credere Agents: Such agents are variables taken help of under the worldwide exchange.
Special Agent-Agents that undertake the role for a specific purpose are referred to as the special agents. Such agents are estate agents, auctioneers and bankers.
Estate Agents: The agents act on behalf of the owner of the property. They follow up with the interested buyers and promote the property for the purpose of sale.
Bankers: Bankers act as the operators for the client facilitating the encashment of the checks so drawn by the clients. The clients instruct the bankers for the pay protection premium or portions of advances that are to be followed by the bankers.
Auctioneers: Agents that carry out the auction of the possession of the client are known as acutioneers. They are dealer’s operators and specialist so consulted at the time of formation of the contract.
Following are the rights of the Claire as an estate agent-
Following are the duties of the Claire as an estate agent-
Monopoly in UK is created in a situation when an organization have more than or equal to 25% of market share. It provides significant power to the commercial entity which can be misused for personal benefits (Cornish, Llewelyn, and Aplin, 2013). For prevention of such unfair practices, following legislation of anti-competitive practice is developed by parliament of UK-
Competition Commission is a statutory body established by parliament of UK to prevent creation of anti-competitive practices. They work as per the guidelines of Office of Fair Trading (OFT). They provide suggestion and solutions to the issues referred by OFT. If these suggestions and solutions are appropriate for public then it is implemented by OFT and government authorities. In addition to this, they have crucial responsibility to identify whether Acquisition and Merger is in public interest or not (Schaffer, Agusti, and Dhooge, 2014). For example merger of Tesco and Safeway was restricted by Competition Commission because deal was eligible to create excessive monopoly power. They regularly investigate and analyze commercial deals and operations to create restriction on abuse of monopoly rights to prevent anti-competitive practices. The Office of Fair Trading was focused on laying down the rules and regulations for the state of affairs to be fair. It promoted health and safety open competition. The OFT concentrated on making the market place a fair place to trade and have positive effect on the economy. The competition commission regulated the mergers or monopolies present in the market. The commission focused on the resolving the matters that were referred through the OFT. The Competition Authority now regulates the functions of both OFT as well as the Competition Commission collectively.
As per the legal definition, dominant position in commercial context can be defined as influencing position due to substantial rights with the organization undertaking regarding specific product or service market. This definition is comprise of following two elements-
Enforceability and misuse of dominant position: Description of misuse of dominant position is provided in Chapter II/ Article 102 prohibition of Competition Act (Schwenzer, 2005). As per this Article if any firm is engaged in anti-competitive practices then they will be obliged to pay statutory penalties up to the amount equal to 10% of their global turnover. Along with this, culprit can get disqualified from being a member of board of director.
Agreement which create restriction on competition is not always considered to be restricted. Exemptions of anti-competitive practices are described in Chapter I or article 101 which are as follow-
However agreements will deem to be restrictive through the object if it is infringed by competition rules (Abuse of a dominant position.2014). The factors that are not considered anti-competitive but fair may the rejection to supply the goods to a company for possessing an unfavorable credit rating. It would in accordance with the Article 102 be fair to deny the supply as it may affect the goodwill of the company in a given market. If the purpose of the article is misused only then it will be regarded as an anti-competitive practice. The new block exemption regulation sets the bar for the production permits allowed to the businesses under a competitive environment. Article 101of the European Union allows the vertical agreements for the regulation of the economy that lessens the business rate.
The law of intellectual property safeguards the rights of the owner related to his/her intellectual capability and creativity. The main purpose for which this law was formed is to stop the unauthorized usage of someone else’s work. The myriad forms of intellectual property have been outlined below –
Patent refers to intellectual property right which is vested in the inventor of a new thing by the government of UK as a territorial right that normally extends to 20 years. The main principles related to protection of inventions by means of patent rights and their breach, are mentioned underneath:
Inventions related to computer development programs can also be patented only on the condition that it consists of something more than merely running software in a very straightforward way. Violation of patent is a punishable offence for which the offender is liable to pay gross penalty.
Copyright safeguards original sound recordings, musical and artistic works, feature films, literary work, video recordings etc. A copyright stays in effect for 70 years post the death of the creator. Nonetheless, the length for sound recordings is 50 years and it is 25 years for typological arrangements. The Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 regulates the rights of the copyright holder wherein the same cannot be misused unless licensed by the copyright holder. If the copyright holder decides to ban the use or authorize the procedures of use then he has the right to do the same. The same may be restricted for use or imitation. The copyright will be determined to be breached if the same are made or sold, displayed in public, exhibited in the public way of trade, or importing the infringed copies without the permission of the copyright holder. Violation of Copyright is normally not a criminal offence. Breaching copyright will be seen as a criminal offence if it is purposely done on a substantial level of during the course of the business. The violation may result in penalizing the infringer to the extent of 5000 Pounds or imprisonment for six months. The copyright holder may summon the legal actions for restriction or claiming the damages.
Part I of the Trademark Act, 1994, relates to the registration process of the trademarks. It undertakes the circumstances such as licensing, infringement, and registration. Part II of the Act includes the international and national aspects of the trademarks. Part III of the Act, provides for the administrative asepcts and Part IV illustrates the general and miscellaneous provisions.
Basis of difference
It is defined as a mark, sign or symbol that differentiates products from another.
Business name refers to the legal name of the company by which it will be recognized by the general public.
This is used for identifying the product or service in the marketplace.
It is utilized for recognizing a company as a whole rather than the whole product or service.
Trademark authorizes an owner to take actions against any person who uses same or nearly same symbol for the product. Moreover, this trademark can avoid breach of a current mark and the plausible implications of being sued.
Right for taking against violation is given in both Intellectual Property Act and Company Act. Infringement in business name is needed to be noted with its all details.
From the present project report it can be concluded that sales agreement should satisfy all implied terms for the fair transfer of possession. If these terms are not fulfilled by buyer or seller then aggrieved party can avail rights for the remedy. To prevent unfair practices through monopoly, anti-competitive legislation is developed by parliament of UK. To protect rights of new invention law of Intellectual property is established to prevent infringement and its unethical use.
UK, EU & US Copyright Law. 2014. [Online]. Available through: <http://www.kcl.ac.uk/prospectus/graduate/uk-eu-and-us-copyright-law/print>. [Accessed on 3rd December 2014].
Schwenzer, I. 2005. Danger of Domestic Preconceived Views with Respect to the Uniform Interpretation of the CISG: The Question of Avoidance in the Case of Non-Conforming Goods and Documents, The. Victoria U. Wellington L. Rev.36.pp 795.
Schaffer, R., Agusti, F., and Dhooge, L. 2014. International business law and its environment. Cengage Learning.
Sale of Goods Act 1979. 2014. [Online]. Available through: <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/54>. [Accessed on 3rd December 2014].
Rush, J. and Ottley, M., 2006. Business Law. Cengage.
Protecting a company's name. 2014. [Online]. Available through: <http://www.companylawclub.co.uk/topics/protecting_a_company_name.shtml>. [Accessed on 3rd December 2014].
Nystén-Haarala, S., Lee, N., and Lehto, J., 2010.Flexibility in contract terms and contracting processes. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 3(3). pp.462 – 478
Middlemiss, S., 2012. The legal impact on employers where there is a sham element in contracts with their workers. International Journal of Law and Management. 54(3). pp.209–221.
Kidner, and Richard. 2007. Resiling from the Anns principle: the variable nature of proximity in negligence. Legal Studies. Blackwell Publishing 7(3).
Fleming, M. H. 2005. UK law enforcement agency use and management of suspicious activity reports: towards determining the value of the regime. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science. London: UCL.
Cornish, W., Llewelyn, G. I. D., and Aplin, T. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marksAnd allied rights.
Bridge, M. 2007. Law for International Sale of Goods, A. Hong Kong LJ. 37. 17.
Boldrin, M., and Levine, D. 2002. The case against intellectual property.American Economic Review, pp. 209-212.
Akintoye, A., Renukappa, S. and Lal, H., 2012. The abolition of the “contracts in writing” rule in the 2009 Construction Act: Potential implications for UK adjudication. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment. 4(2). pp.140–156.
Abuse of a dominant position. 2014. [Online]. Available through: <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284422/oft402.pdf>. [Accessed on 3rd December 2014].