The Role of Sustainability and ESG Criteria in Shaping Global Business Strategies

The Role of Sustainability and ESG Criteria in Shaping Global Business Strategies

Student Name:

Student Id:

Executive Summary

This portfolio is on the theme of sustainability and ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) considerations in global business strategies. The present work examines how companies adopt ESG strategies, how implementing sustainable solutions affects financial and operational performance, and how fulfilling ESG goals affects companies’ reputations and consumer trust. The paper outlines key patterns of ESG implementation and offers recommendations to companies on how sustainability can be used to improve their competitive advantage.

Also, the portfolio is based on five core personal and professional skills that managers need to meet to respond to the controversies related to ESG-centred business strategies. The following outline is presented for the action plan for the acquisition of these skills. It is noted that there is a need for PD to support running in today’s changing business environment of the globe.

Introduction

ESG, which stands for Environmental, Social and Governance criteria, or Sustainable factors, are now widely implemented and mandatory for any strategies of any international business nowadays because of the responsible and sustainable economy that is growing very fast. The trend is continuing to rise, indicating the awareness of the need for business organizations to meet their financial targets while satisfying their corporate and social responsibilities to society and the environment. Specifically, this portfolio is aimed at answering the following question: how do ESG criteria affect business strategies in the modern competitive environment? Therefore, the objectives of this research are to evaluate the extent of integration of ESG into operational value chains and business models, their sustainability effects on financial performance, and the impact of corporate sustainability on company reputation and consumer trust. To consider the relevance of the topic, which focuses on sustainability and ESG factors to build global business actions.

Task 1: Global Business Trends and Research on Sustainability and ESG

1.1 Background and Rationale

Overview of Global Business Trends

Over the last few years, several global business trends have developed that have revolutionized the context of corporate management. Sustainability and the incorporation of the Environmental Social Governance (ESG) factors are two other significant issues today. Current global issues like climatic change, pollution of the environment, social inequity, and bad corporate governance policies expose the audiences and stakeholders (Abdullah, et. al., 2024). Companies are no longer evaluated not merely on returns on their operations but on their worth to the environment, society, and business ethics. Mature awareness that companies have to be sustainable and profitable while aiming at the double bottom line is the reason why companies eagerly embrace sustainability and ESG initiatives.

Importance of ESG in Global Business Strategies

Several ESG considerations are now accepted as fundamental elements of value creation. Change that is happening in organizations, which makes them start using sustainable practices, is defined by the customers’ needs, the investors’ requirements, and legal requirements. ESG principles help such companies gain a better reputation, improve performance and increase stakeholders’ confidence in operations (Li, et. al., 2021). The financial markets, as it is seen today, tend to compensate firms with better ESG performance because now they are realizing that sustainability is linked with less risk and better profitability in the future. Moreover, such compliance is effective when the firm meets specific environmental, social, and governance standards; thus, increasing its capacity to manage risks and address compliance issues is now a significant component of evolutionary business plans.

Research Rationale

The importance of ESG studies to global business strategy formulation is anchored in its functions in confronting today's problems. When organizations continue to seek both, profit and purpose, ESG serves to guide the operations of the business and address the sustainability objectives of the society and environment (Armstrong, 2020). This pressure is simply because in the current world of business transformation and conscious regulation from both the governing bodies and investors, as well as the customers, it becomes important to understand how ESG can affect strategic management. Moreover, the global environment and business environment especially the trend towards sustainable development where the regulation of climate actions and social responsibility calls for the integration of such practices in the organization to enjoy a competitive advantage. Hence, having a clear concept of ESG’s function essentially is a critical component in outlining how corporations may succeed within an increasingly uncertain and competitive global climate.

1.2 Literature Review and Theoretical Framework

Review of Relevant Literature

Cognitive ESG integration into business strategies has attracted a lot of attention in the scholarly literature in recent years owing to the desire by academia to explore the effects of ESG on organizational performance and sustainability (Hill, 2022). Theoretical approaches that can be useful in understanding how businesses can incorporate the three dimensions of the TBL approach or perform in a manner that benefits the multiple stakeholders of the Stakeholder Theory are, for example. TBL named by John Elkington, focused on the idea that the company should calculate the benefit in terms of not only financial gain but also on the people (social responsibility) and the earth (responsibility to the environment). This model enables businesses to assess their sustainability in this world where more than financial elements will shape the future of organizations.

Another such key theoretical perspective also known as Stakeholder Theory underlines the necessity of recognizing all individuals and groups that are significant for organizational functioning such as its employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, and stockholders (Sciarelli, et. al., 2021). This theory encourages companies to take utmost responsibility for the outside environment rather than the shareholder returns alone.

Current research shows that firms with sound ESG plans signify superior short- and long-run performance and business prospects. For example, a study conducted among companies reveals that firms that adopt policies of environmental sustainability not only minimize their impact on the natural environment through the efficient use of resources, water, and energy, but also decrease their expenses (Daugaard, and Ding, 2022). When it comes to ethical practices, where a company may uphold diversity, inclusion, or give back to their community, they will likely see more of their employees engaged, and likely more loyalty from their current customers. Elements of transparency, ethical decision-making, and accountability can help decrease risks, diminish potential controversy and improve corporate governance image.

Conceptual Understanding

The core of ESG revolves around three interconnected pillars:

1. Environmental: This examines the organization’s effect on the natural surroundings or environment, especially about matters concerning climate change, and emission of carbon among other matters concerning the environment.

2. Social: This looks at issues of handling employees, suppliers, customers, and communities as stakeholders within the firm (Serafeim, and Yoon, 2022). Social includes matters such as employment conditions, diversity and stakeholder relations.

3. Governance: Governance brings changes to corporate management, particularly on matters to do with leadership, executive remuneration, board of directors’ composition, and corporate integrity. Proper governance facilitates accountability and that is why longevity is encouraged.

These are the ESG criteria that let companies implement the international standards of sustainability into their practice, making both the image and the performance better (Freeman, Dmytriyev, and Phillips, 2021). Incorporated appropriately into business approaches, the integration of ESG practices can stimulate creativity and fund attraction while managing the consequences of environmental or social disruption.

1.3 Research Aim, Objectives, and Questions

Research Aim

This research aims to explore the growing importance of sustainability and ESG criteria in shaping the strategies of global businesses.

Research Questions

1. In what ways are companies utilizing sustainability within the value proposition of their firms?

2. In what ways does adopting ESG practices affect the financial and operational condition?

3. Specifically, the following questions will be examined: How does meeting ESG goals affect company reputation and consumer confidence?

Research Objectives

1. To measure the level of implementation of sustainability and ESG into international strategic management.

2. To assess the impact of ESG practices in terms of cost and performance consequences.

3. In this case, the researcher seeks to find out the impact raised out of ESG on corporate reputation and consumer trust.

1.4 Data Sources and Methodology

Primary and Secondary Data Sources

The research is therefore proposed to employ both primary and secondary data. Regarding the primary data, interviews with business managers and sustainability officers of firms, which act in compliance with ESG practices might be illustrative of how these approaches are deployed. Questionnaires may also be from the business people to determine their attitude toward ESG and its importance in organizational performance (Habib, 2023). To that end, ESG will be explored through the lens of primary research respondents’ qualitative views on integration and difficulties.

Secondary data will be drawn from academic journals, sustainability reports and analysis from the manufacturing firms and analysis from various industrial bodies such as the United Nations, International Business Leaders Forum, and Global Reporting Initiative (Park, and Lee, 2023). These sources will help extract quantitative information and analysis of the EI’s on ESG practices across various industries and the globe.

Justification of Data Sources

By collating both primary and secondary data, it will be better placed to determine how ESG considerations are currently incorporated into organizational strategies and plans. The collection of data from first-hand experience will give information on the practical use while the second data collection will give the theoretical and empirical background of the study (Huang, 2022). Biases or restricted access to primary data will be eliminated through triangulating results with accurate secondary data sources.

1.5 Analysis of ESG's Role in Business Strategy

Analysis

ESG is now integrated into strategies as a business necessity to fulfill existing rules, respond to customers’ needs, and improve future performance. For instance, Nestlé's sustainability management in cutting back on carbon emissions, and water stewardship resulted in operational advantages and enhanced brand image (Barko, Cremers, and Renneboog, 2022). Likewise, investment in renewable energy has helped Microsoft to enhance its position as a leader in being green in terms of corporate responsibility and at the same time, it has minimized corporate energy risks in the long run. Working within the pillars of ESG is also a solution for improving the company’s performance and overcoming any risks, as it creates new business opportunities and contributes to its sustainable development and better financial and operating results.

Task 2: Personal and Professional Skills Reflection

2.1 Identification of Skills

Personal and Professional Skills Needed as a Manager

To address ESG issues that can arise in the global business context, a manager needs to possess a combination of personal /professional traits suitable for sustainability and governance as proposed in Task 1. The five key skills identified are:

1. Strategic Thinking

   • Relevance: ESG should therefore be evaluated as part of strategic thinking about the corporation’s overall strategy (Suretno, Adrianto, and Alfarisi, 2022). Senior leaders need to think about how they will anticipate future events on the horizon that will affect them, for example, changes in laws that may impact sustainability initiatives or altering customer expectations and ensure that sustainability considerations are integrated into each tier of the business.

   • ESG Context: Strategic thinking helps managers to correlate ESG aims with the organizational goals of improving sustainable practices that meet the financial outcomes and stakeholder value.

2. Leadership

   • Relevance: For sustainable and ethical delegation of resources and responsibility, proper leadership styles should be supported (Shenkar, Luo, and Chi, 2021). In making ESG principles part of the organizational culture a manager must be an example to the different teams and ensure that sustainability is practiced.

   • ESG Context: ESG activities require the support of upper management and senior leaders to be effectively adopted at the company. To be specific, the leaders engage themselves to lead the corporate vision towards attaining long-run sustainability objectives.

3. Project Management

   • Relevance: Applying ESG measures is usually associated with working with large-scope activities, including CO2 emissions decrease or supply chain optimization. Effective coordination of resources, time and people working on the project is made easy by good project management skills.

   • ESG Context: It designs and coordinates how sustainability will be implemented, setting realistic goals while holding individuals and teams responsible for specific tasks, and ultimately producing results that are easily measurable (Peng, 2022).

4. Adaptability

   • Relevance: Globally, the complexity of ESG rules and trends, market demands, and technological changes require flexibility in implementing the management framework. Managers require the ability to influence in light of new information as well as the ability to adapt to the changing environment.

   • ESG Context: Flexibility is also important because ESG requirements are dynamic, and this means that managers can switch the strategies they use to meet the new requirements or provide a response to stakeholder demands.

5. Stakeholder Management

   • Relevance: The concern with stakeholder engagement is required to mediate the competing demands of multiple interest groups, including shareholders, consumers, employees, and official entities, who may have different expectations of company ESG outcomes.

   • ESG Context: Managers require stakeholder interaction with the purpose of identifying stakeholders’ concerns, fulfilling their expectations, and communicating ESG activities and results.

2.2 Critical Reflection on Skills

Self-Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses

1. Strategic Thinking: Strategic thinking today is at a moderate level of mastery. Although long-term patterns and decisions of a business organization can be understandable and effective, some possibilities remain unexplored regarding the inclusion of ESG-specific considerations into business strategy management. It is currently possible to improve one’s capacity to predict future adjustments in regulations that may be pertinent to sustainability ambitions.

2. Leadership: Specific soft skills include leadership among the teams and conveying the status of organizational goals. However, it is possible to achieve even better results in terms of not only stimulating and motivating organizational actions that address sustainability issues but also in the activities implied by the ethical leadership and ESG vision.

3. Project Management: Project management competency is fairly well developed especially in cross-functional team management, project timing, and deliverables. Nonetheless, the problem is to how achieve sustainability objectives and also maintain project efficiency as much as overall goals could be altered due to budget issues.

4. Adaptability: Versatility is one of the individual resources, which are valuable for responding to both market and operational changes. However, more attention should be paid to the specifics of ESG adaptability, such as the lack of preparedness for immediate changes in regulation or the integration of new ideas on sustainability into the business strategy.

5. Stakeholder Management: This skill is a work in progress, to a rather large degree. Despite mostly positive communication with stakeholders, there seems to be a gap in how companies deal with different ESG concerns from multiple stakeholders especially where investors’ demands conflict with environmental objectives.

Reflection on Learning Theories

Another learning cycle that is useful in explaining the growth of these skills is Kolb’s learning cycle. The cycle involves four stages: It has been called concrete experience, observational understanding, verbal conceptualization, and active experimentation (Lasserre, and Monteiro, 2022). Thus, a combination of retrospective analysis of the current executive strength and weakness enables them to envision how they could enhance their skill and proactively employ the enhanced form of the skill or trait in some other situation. For instance, a manager thinks and analyzes weaknesses in areas such as adaptability and leadership regarding an ESG project; proposes and develops ideas; and implements them in the other project.

2.3 Action Plan

Detailed Personal Development Plan (PDP)

1. Strategic Thinking

• Steps for Improvement: Attend degree programs in advanced strategic management, especially those courses, which highlight sustainability.

• Resources: Distance learning, workshops on ESG approach.

• Timeline: Training should be completed within half an hour or 6 months.

• Milestones: Ensure that the employee engages in two ESG-specific strategic management workshops for the first three months.

2. Leadership

• Steps for Improvement: Lead ethical leadership and sustainability coaching with a primary goal of promoting the ideas within the class.

• Resources: Guidance from top management officials with good knowledge of ESG.

• Timeline: Sustained overhaul for the next year.

• Milestones: Finalize the first set of leadership coaching exercises within three months of establishing a leadership training relationship and apply these strategies in workplace teams.

3. Project Management

• Steps for Improvement: Get certified in green project management, for instance, PRiSM certification.

• Resources: Courses that relate to project management with sustainability.

• Timeline: Get certified within 9 months.

• Milestones: Finish a project management course and use concepts in an existing project.

4. Adaptability

• Steps for Improvement: Participate in activities that are related to crisis management and regulatory change.

• Resources: Modules of online simulations, and scenarios of organizations as learners.

• Timeline: Do exercises throughout the 4 months.

• Milestones: Apply the changes to current projects depending on new regulations on challenges.

5. Stakeholder Management

• Steps for Improvement: Visit workshops regarding the engagement of stakeholders, especially on ESG.

• Resources: They include stakeholder management seminars and ESG reporting courses among others.

• Timeline: A constant over 6 months improvement as part of improved cycle times.

• Milestones: Complete a stakeholder mapping exercise within the first 2 months and improve engagement activities in ESG projects.

Conclusion

ESG integration is important for long-term success because it will help them meet all the regulations required for operation, minimize the operational risks they face, and improve their reputation. ESG practices are not only responsible for achieving profitability but also for improving the relationship between consumers and investors. Also, there is a need to understand the direction of the corporation and other critical personality and/ or professional attributes required for managers to undertake the task of implementing ESG. Performance improvement is important, firstly, because the profession does not stand still and changes occur in world business, including issues of sustainable development. Managers will be ready to respond to future challenges or seize future opportunities, which means that staying informed in this case will help the organization in that sense.

References

Abdullah, A., Yamak, S., Korzhenitskaya, A., Rahimi, R. and McClellan, J., 2024. Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), pp.2250-2268. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bse.3596

Armstrong, A., 2020. Ethics and ESG. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(3), pp.6-17. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2107&context=aabfj

Barko, T., Cremers, M. and Renneboog, L., 2022. Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), pp.777-812. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z.pdf

Daugaard, D. and Ding, A., 2022. Global drivers for ESG performance: The body of knowledge. Sustainability, 14(4), p.2322. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2322/pdf

Freeman, R.E., Dmytriyev, S.D. and Phillips, R.A., 2021. Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of management, 47(7), pp.1757-1770. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0149206321993576

Habib, A.M., 2023. Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon, 9(7). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(23)05055-7.pdf

Hill, C.W., 2022. Global business today. McGraw-Hill. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/bitstream/handle/123456789/12940/Contents.pdf?sequence=1

Huang, D.Z.X., 2022. Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: Valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting & Finance, 62, pp.1983-2010. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:c00aed8/UQc00aed8_OA.pdf

Lasserre, P. and Monteiro, F., 2022. Global strategic management. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.ascdegreecollege.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Global_Strategic_Management.pdf

Li, T.T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T. and Wang, D.D., 2021. ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), p.11663. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11663/pdf

Park, Y.S. and Lee, H.S., 2023. The roles of finance in ESG management. Asia?Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 52(3), pp.354-373. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Young-Park-25/publication/371598164_The_Roles_of_Finance_in_ESG_Management/links/64cb137891fb036ba6bfc62f/The-Roles-of-Finance-in-ESG-Management.pdf

Peng, M.W., 2022. Global strategy. Cengage learning. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/bitstream/handle/123456789/12702/Contents.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Sciarelli, M., Cosimato, S., Landi, G. and Iandolo, F., 2021. Socially responsible investment strategies for the transition towards sustainable development: The importance of integrating and communicating ESG. The TQM Journal, 33(7), pp.39-56. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TQM-08-2020-0180/full/pdf

Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A.S., 2022. Understanding the business relevance of ESG issues. Journal of Financial Reporting, 7(2), pp.207-212. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ESG-Business-Relevance-JFR-02152021.pdf

Shenkar, O., Luo, Y. and Chi, T., 2021. International business. Routledge. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/bitstream/handle/123456789/13049/Contents.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Suretno, F., Adrianto, F. and Alfarisi, M.F., 2022. Effect of environment, social and governance disclosure on firm value. JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori Dan Implementasi, 13(2), pp.121-128. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/bti/article/download/14458/7657