PROECT MANAGEMENT
London Marathon Foundation Open Air Fitness Event in association with Oxford Business College Charity
STUDENT NAME:
STUDENT ID:
Introduction
London Marathon Foundation is one of the major fund raisers in the country, inspiring and educating the students across the country for a heathy and a happy life. The foundation is collaborating with the Oxford Business College and with Green House Sports for the funds. The foundation is aiming for its continuous expansion so that it can become a leading voice in this field of contributing in the good health of the people. The campaign will create the awareness among people about their good health and healthy lifestyle (Sharma et al., 2021).
Task 1
Objective of the project
The reports aim at outlining the requirements and how to execute the event which is called as London Marathon Foundation Open Air Fitness Event in association with Oxford Business College Charity. The projects tend to inspire the children and adult for having a better health and a good lifestyle (Melnyk et al., 2020). The event also wants to show the successful collaboration with the Green House Sports. The comprehensive project management plan can ensure smooth flow of the event with goal fulfilment.
Deliverable of the project
The project deliverable includes a well-managed event, having 100% participation, the event also includes participation of various stakeholder that includes the advertisers, NGO, sports equipment suppliers, suppliers, logistics partner and guests of honours. The deliverable also includes right management for the players including their hospitality and transportation facility overall there is a need for a smooth conduct of the event (Bladen et al., 2022)
Project management and its methodologies
Project management refers to the process of creating a plan and managing the event from paper to its actual implementation in a successful manner. It includes maximum utilisation of resources with minimum wastage and confusion.
There are different methodologies which can be used for creating a project as per the needs and requirement of the project every project needs a special process so that thig can get completed easily without rush (Thesing et al 2021). The most common methodologies for such kind of plans are
Waterfall Methodology: The approach involves work in a sequential manner where the tasks are divides into the linear order and each stage should be completed before starting another. It is beneficial for the projects having huge event one after the other it reduces the confusion. It is not suitable for shorter project having less work
Scrum Methodology: the approach includes breaking the huge process into simpler cycles the model is quick, collaborative and adaptable to changes. It is not suitable for the linear projects
Agile methodology: the methodology aims at including changes during the process of implementing the plan. It is suitable for the plan which does not have the fixed outlines and does not have the fixed schedule.
Recommended methodology
The recommended methodology is the waterfall method as it is most appropriate for project construction it will allow the linear follow up of the schedule which is essential part of implementing the project work, the stakeholder will also get the required amount of attention through this model. It can ensure a consistent progress and measurable outcomes (Senarath et al., 2021).
Example of this methodology
For any electronic manufacturing company, they use this model for implementation of the process where the main goa is to complete the production of the product in a certain quantity and by ensuring the quality standards (Jayadinata et al., 2024). The strategy would begin from collecting of raw material to finally packaging the goods for further sales.
Task 2
Network Diagram
Network diagram is a visual representation of a network showing the relation between different elements of the network and how they are connected. In project management this s considered as an important tool for understanding the models.
Critical Path
Gantt chart
Gantt chart is a tool that shows a project timeline and task in a horizontal ar chart for better representation.
Task 3
Stakeholder Matrix
Stake holder matrix refers to the tool of project management which is used for coordinating with the different stakeholders associated with the project. The tool also identifies the priority on the basis of which the manager can decide the best strategy to deal with each group of stakeholders (Bahadorestani et al., 2020). It can clearly show the interest and power of the stakeholders both internal and external.
LMF stakeholder matrix
POWER |
High
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
Low |
High |
|
INTREST |
|||
Stakeholder |
Power |
Interest |
Type |
Management Strategy |
Communication Strategy |
Government authority |
High |
Low |
External |
Keep the informed and follow the rules and regulation |
Regular inspection |
Logistics |
High |
Low |
Internal |
Manage closely |
Weekly meeting nd progress |
Sponsors |
High |
Low |
External |
Provide all the financial information |
Weekly audits |
Event coordinator |
High |
High |
Internal |
Manage closely |
Event planning and regular meeting |
Oxford business school |
High |
High |
Internal |
Manage closely |
Active involvement Daily report |
Green house sport |
High |
High |
Internal |
Keep them informed |
Active involvement |
Public |
Low |
Low |
External |
Encourage more participation |
Advertising and promotion activities |
Local vendors |
Low |
Low |
External |
Manage closely |
Weekly progress and reports |
Equipment Suppliers |
Low |
High |
External |
Manage closely |
Active involvement |
Participants |
Low |
High |
External |
Provide all information |
Keep them informed |
Task 4
Work breakdown structure
The structure helps to define the tasks and the projects by breaking it into smaller groups for better management (Anggraini et al.,2021)
TASK 5
Risk analysis table
Risk analysis is necessary for any project as it calculates the amount of risk to be taken and how to manage them appropriately (Modarres et al.,2023). The following table shows the risk analysis table for London marathon foundation.
Risk |
Likelihood |
Severity |
Impact |
Mitigation Strategy |
Impact |
Medical emergency |
5 |
3 |
15 |
First aid availability and active health checkup |
10 |
Safety concerns |
3 |
3 |
9 |
Use less travelled areas and conduct the marathon on Sundays |
4 |
Weather condition |
4 |
2 |
8 |
Take measure for environment crisis |
3 |
Logistics issues |
6 |
3 |
18 |
Prepare backup vehicles and rooms for guests |
11 |
Security threats |
2 |
2 |
4 |
Take the help of security guards |
2 |
Permit and compliance |
4 |
4 |
16 |
Regularly fulfil the compliances of the government authority |
5 |
Financial risk |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Strict budget monitoring and regular audits |
7 |
Public relation and communication |
4 |
3 |
12 |
Use online and offline marketing tools |
6 |
Crew Management |
3 |
4 |
12 |
Proper coordination |
7 |
Participant management |
5 |
2 |
10 |
Inform everything in advance |
5 |
Public Engagement |
3 |
2 |
6 |
Establish good relation by keeping them informed |
2 |
Post event issues |
3 |
1 |
3 |
Controlling and taking follow ups |
2
|
Location problem |
3 |
3 |
9 |
Have an option of a backup location |
2 |
Budget overrun |
6 |
3 |
18 |
Stick on the panned budget |
10 |
Guest withdrawal |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Coordinate with guests |
1 |
Task 6
Quality control table
Quality control table: it refers to the table which ensure the quality of each of the element being used to make a successful event. It is essential for a successful event (Badrick et al.,2020)
Quality expectation |
Acceptance criteria |
Quality specification |
Control measures |
Average footfall |
Depending on the location and resources |
1800+ footfall. |
Effective marketing. |
Advertisement reach |
To market the event in in all age groups |
Updates on all social media platforms, website and at offline places. |
Use of online and offline tools. |
Photography quality |
Best quality to capture memories |
HD, 4K videos |
Use of high-tech cameras and equipment, hire professional photographer. |
Safety compliance |
No accident and no injuries |
UK safety standards |
Hire body guards and secure the event location. |
Conclusion
With the help of project management, the event can be organised successfully by considering the needs and wants of the stakeholders. Calculating the risk and by ensuring the quality. Using the waterfall methodology, we can do the task in most efficient manner (Klever et al., 2021). The LMF open air fitness event in association with Oxford Business School would be able to achieve the motive of welfare and inspiring the youth towards a better health.
References
Anggraini, A. and Latief, Y., 2021, April. Development of work breakdown structure standard for safety planning on stadium construction work based on risk. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1858, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.
Badrick, T., Bietenbeck, A., Katayev, A., van Rossum, H.H., Loh, T.P., Cervinski, M.A. and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Analytical Quality, 2020. Implementation of patient-based real-time quality control. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 57(8), pp.532-547.
Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N. and Sadiq, R., 2020. Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, p.118402.
Bladen, C., Kennell, J., Abson, E. and Wilde, N., 2022. Events management: An introduction. Routledge.
Klever, S., Visser, M. and Engelfriet, A., 2021. Planning and organisation. In Digital Marketing Fundamentals (pp. 564-621). Routledge.
Melnyk, B.M., Kelly, S.A., Stephens, J., Dhakal, K., McGovern, C., Tucker, S., Hoying, J., McRae, K., Ault, S., Spurlock, E. and Bird, S.B., 2020. Interventions to improve mental health, well-being, physical health, and lifestyle behaviors in physicians and nurses: a systematic review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 34(8), pp.929-941
Modarres, M. and Groth, K., 2023. Reliability and risk analysis. CRC Press.
Senarath, U.S., 2021. Waterfall methodology, prototyping and agile development. Tech. Rep., pp.1-16.
Thesing, T., Feldmann, C. and Burchardt, M., 2021. Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.746-756.
|


