Accident Prevention Strategies in Civil Engineering

The safety of this line of construction is underlined by the fact that every construction and infrastructure project entail some degree of risk hence the concept of accident prevention is central in civil engineering (Lee and Jeong, 2024). Accidents in civil engineering structures, materials, or designs, ranging from small slips to big failures, are dangerous to human lives and property. This paper discusses the methods of accident prevention, to name but a few the Swiss Cheese and Domino theories, types of accident investigations, and continuous improvement activities. The subsequent discussion also explains how these strategies are used in civil engineering, and real-life examples of their usage are also provided. Fortunately, an understanding of these areas can greatly improve knowledge of how risks can be mitigated and safety culture can be improved in civil engineering projects.

Accident Prevention Strategies and Techniques

Organizational risk management initiatives are usually systematic approaches that identify and control hazards which may lead to accidents. Among every day accident models used in civil engineering projects, there are two particularly popular models named Swiss Cheese Model and the Domino Theory.

The Swiss Cheese Model

Errors should be designed out and this is ???? explained by the concept known as the Swiss Cheese Model, named by James Reason after the cheese with many holes. It is right to say that every layer of the security concept (cheese slice) corresponds to the safety measure while holes in the cheese stand for the lack of effectiveness in those measures. One creates a condition where the holes can align and let the risks go through the different layers without being addressed (Chen et al., 2023). Although systematic, this model is especially useful in civil engineering to consider how design, construction, and management of errors at sites might co-ordinate to lead to major accidents like structures collapse and workers’ accidents.

The large construction project is one of the civil engineering areas where many layers of protection are used to avoid hazards, thus, the Swiss Cheese Model is rather helpful in that context. However, if there is a breakdown in communication between the project managers, contractors, and workers in following these protocols an operational disaster is likely to occur. For example, poor supervision coupled with poor quality materials may cause building collapse (Rose et al., 2023) and (Cao and Cheng, 2024). Civil engineers may identify gaps in their safety measures that cut down on risks by introducing several layers of safety (Dyreborg et al., 2022).

The Domino Theory

The Domino Theory, developed by Heinrich, suggests that accidents occur in a chain reaction of five factors: social context, error of the individual, risky behavior with the system, mishap and harm. If any of these “dominoes” is has been taken away, the chain is interrupted and the accident does not occur (Shabani et al., 2023). Elements of civil engineering undertakings are recognized to encompass many parties and much social interaction between man as well as apparatus; therefore, a domino effect is likely to occur much often. Project managers are often able to control an accident because they are able to determine hazard elements as the problem progresses.

In the real world, most civil engineers use this theory in risk management in construction equipment. For example, if an unsafe condition such as faulty scaffolding is discovered then its elimination from the project is desirable. Moreover, the number of unsafe acts, in relation to the Domino Theory, can be decreased by educating the worker through training lesson plans.

Accident Investigation

Accident investigation is crucial in civil engineering to determine the cause of an incident, and provided right measures to eliminate such incidences in the future while enhancing safety measures. One out of all the methodologies of accident analysis is AcciMap. It analyses the major causes of accidents on different tiers starting with the operator up to regulatory failure (Rose et al., 2023). This model is very relevant to civil engineering since it demonstrates that top management decisions, management decisions, government regulations, or even employees working on construction sites are all precursors to accidents (Xuecai et al., 2024).

An area that civil engineers can employ for real-life accident investigation is the evaluation of the failures in the construction of tailings dams in Brazil. In these cases, the inquiry showed that a number of factors such as lack of supervision and inadequate supervision and inspection, and poor maintenance compared to other countries, and flawed design contributed to the disasters. AcciMap, another of the models, helps civil engineers to see accident as a complex phenomenon, which requires more effective safety strategies and measures (Rose et al., 2023).

Moreover, the identification and application of complex network models in the context of accident investigation has received much attention in the recent past. These models are useful for probabilities of accidents by depicting how workers, conditions of the environment, and functionality of the equipment’s interrelate (Deng et al., 2023). For example, in mega construction projects, the network models can determine areas where different risks intersect each other, in order for engineers, more time, money and energy can be dedicated to reducing the possibility of accidents occurring.

Continuous Improvement Measures

A particularly important action in civil engineering regards continuous improvement activities that are vital for an effective safety culture as well as for the overall incorporation of experience drawn from past accidents into subsequent projects. There is a number of continuous improvement methodologies but one of the most popular is the PDCA cycle meaning Plan, Do, Check, Act. This model can include constant enhancements in safety measures, yet the basic process is planning (risk assessment), doing (application of preventing measures), checking (assessment of the measure’s effectiveness), and acting (amendment of measures based on feedback) (Liu et al., 2024) and (Kim et al., 2024).

There’s this Total Loss Control (TLC) approach which is yet another method of taking continuous improvement of safety. This is a method employed in different industries in Zimbabwe and has been seen to help decrease proportions of accident by encouraging all the workers to embrace more of safety making them constantly involve in safety measures (Shabani et al., 2023).

It is suggested that both the PDCA and the TLC frameworks can be embraced in civil engineering programs especially those sectors that undertake high risk activities like tunneling or bridge construction. Such measures assist the project managers to determine what aspects of safety in their project are likely to behave weak links and then avoid the disasters caused by these missing links.

Application in Civil Engineering

In civil engineering risk management, protection, investigation, and constant enhancement activities are applied on a regular basis. During design, planning, construction up to the post-construction phases, engineers are required to uphold safety in every docket.

Design Stage: Possible risks in the aspects of engineering design involve properties of the materials to be used, and environmental challenges to be faced during the construction process, and measures to avoid risks to workers. For instance, in constructing bridges, the engineers are likely to carry out vulnerability studies in order to establish areas of risk they could encounter including high winds and weak sub-soil and construct structures capable of handling the challenges (Liu et al., 2024).

Construction Stage: By the construction phase, safety monitoring should be affected continuously. To the engineers it is equally important to make sure that the workers wear appropriate safety clothing and equipment and that they work under correct usage of machineries. During construction work activities in expansive construction areas, the security officers patrol for safety checks throughout the day to confirm that subsequent layers of safety barriers are sound, in compliance with the Swiss Cheese Model (Zhang et al., 2024).

Example 1: One example in civil engineering is an application that uses the best deployment techniques of roadside units. In this case, civil engineers use accident risk analysis in placing safety barriers and warning notices, to avoid cases of vehicle accidents while conducting construction activities on major roads (Zhang et al., 2024).

Example 2: Another example of the systems thinking accident analysis includes the one applied to tunnel construction (Yuxin et al., 2024). Network models help in predicting risks in advance, if used optimally with reference to worker position and equipment operation, the risk of the occurrence of an accident drastically minimized (Delikhoon et al., 2022).

Conclusion

The principles used in accident prevention, investigation techniques, and ways of monitoring continual improvement are critical in safety of civil engineering (Huang et al., 2022). A number of methods exist which highlight the gaps in safety systems such as the Swiss Cheese and Domino theories; methods that show the systemic causes of an accident like AcciMap. Maintenance process PDCA and Total Loss Control are useful for civil engineers to keep enhancing the safety measures and eliminate recurrences of the sort. If these strategies are incorporated during design and construction of these structures, engineers can greatly minimize accident prone conditions as a safeguard to the lives of the workers and the public. Such approaches are illustrated by the use of practical examples in deploying roadside units and constructing tunnels that have been advanced in sustainable civil engineering projects.

Preliminary Occupational Hygiene Survey: Commercial Tower Construction Site

Introduction

This paper gives the results of a pilot occupational hygiene assessment done on the Commercial Tower Construction Site. As identified in the survey, the objectives included the need to measure and quantify exposure of employees to hazardous chemical substances and physical agents at workplaces, and to determine the degree of effectiveness of current preventive safety measures. Recommendations derived from the survey results are also given in relation to safety. The understandings gained from the employees will help in continuous endeavors towards enhancing health risks linked with hazardous exposures within construction sites (Ranasinghe et al., 2023).

Rationale for the Survey

Construction zones are high risk zones by virtue that most of the workers pull articles that make it possible for them to be in contact with a variety of dangerous chemical compounds, physical elements; ergonomic stressors etc. The purpose of this survey was to determine measures to eliminate or control specific hazards, assess the sufficiency of current protection measures and receive more input from employees regarding areas of weakness. Essential: When it comes to construction, the construction industry bears the ultimate responsibility of ensuring a safe work environment is provided mainly concerning the activities that involve the use of materials that may harm the health of the people involved-in the long run (Jepson et al., 2022). Furthermore, the construction workers are aging, making them more vulnerable to occupational diseases; therefore, targeted hygiene inspections to evaluate risk exposure are needed (Ranasinghe et al., 2023).

Safety Equipment Used to Test Exposure Levels

In assessing hazardous exposure levels, the following safety equipment was used:

Dust Monitors: These devices were installed in highly utilized zones to capture data on airborne particulate amounts. Dust, especially that which contains silica, is a major respiratory risk factor
Noise Meters: Supervising noise intensity is critical because construction equipment tends to produce unhealthy decibel values that result in cumulative hearing loss if employees receive inadequate protection (Babalola et al., 2023)
Vibration Sensors: To quantify exposure to high level of vibration particularly for those employees who work with vibrating equipment, some instruments were used to record levels against stated norms.
Gas Detectors: Carbon monoxide and volatile organic compound (VOC) detectors were installed as markers of toxic gases in the environment. These gases are rampant in construction because of emissions from the equipment used, and the application of chemical solvents (Zhang et al., 2020).

The supreme advantage of this equipment was in offering real-time monitoring data whereby the hazardous exposures were rapidly identified for correction.

Specific Hazards in the Chosen Environment

Survey responses from employees revealed significant exposure to multiple hazardous substances:

Dust, Asbestos, and Silica: Looking at the survey data, 70% of workers said they frequently come across these airborne particles. Continual breathing of silica, a mineral dust found in many workplaces, leads to silicosis while exposure to asbestos, a well-known carcinogenic mineral fiber, causes asbestosis and mesothelioma (Parsamehr et al., 2023).
Lead: 50endants said they had experienced lead especially in demolition sites where lead-containing paints and materials are detected. Lead poisoning has negative effects on the neurological system as well as other chronic health effects.
Solvents and Other Chemicals: As for the construction activities, 20% of workers stated they handled solvents at their work providing painting and cleaning services. When left uncontrolled, these chemicals can cause both short term and long-term health complications such as respiratory complications and skin sensitivity (Rasouli et al., 2024).
Noise and Vibration: About 60% of respondents expressed normal exposure to high noise levels, 30% reported regular exposure to harmful vibrations from machines including jackhammers and drills. Long-term effects of these physical agents are hearing impairment and musculoskeletal diseases (Jepson et al., 2022).

Limitations While Conducting the Survey

Several limitations were encountered during the hygiene survey:

Access to Certain Areas: Particularly where active demolition was being conducted or work was otherwise dangerous, some parts of the construction site were necessarily inaccessible for an extended period. Which in turn limited the possibility to control these zones in general and in detail.
Response Bias: Another weakness of the study is the fact that there is response bias in the self-reported data even that much care was taken to facilitate honest responses. Some employees may have omitted their exposure or, in fact, may have overestimated protective measures that are already in place (Simukonda & Emuze, 2024).
Monitoring Time: Depending on the time of day, exposure levels can vary because of the nature of construction taking place on the site. The monitoring was conducted for several days; however, intermittent releases at relatively short time intervals were not detected (Yap et al., 2024).
Training and Awareness: Some of the workers were observed to have poor perception on safety measures to be observed and how to use personal protective gear correctly. This could have impacted on their capacity to evaluate risks effectively (Newaz et al. 2024).

Results and Findings

The survey data provides insights into both the current state of exposure and the effectiveness of safety controls:

Training and Awareness: About three-fourth of the respondents asserted that their employers provided some measures of training most frequently in working with dangerous substances, but only half of the same workers stated that they had a strong level of understanding of the measures that they need to take when handling such substances in workplace. This indicates that there might be a problem with the training interventions’ efficiency (Heydari et al., 2024).
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Despite, approximately 90% of respondents reported having access to PPE, including respirators and hearing protection; 40 % stated they did not always use PPE correctly, due to discomfort or lack of enforcement (Rasouli et al., 2024).
Safety Controls: Half of the respondents working in the companies estimated that the current safety controls helped reduce risks by merely 50%. Specifically, several respondents suggested that air quality measurements should be conducted more often, and appropriate safety regulations should be better implemented (Dobrucali et al., 2024).
Exposure Levels: The concentrations of dusts provided revealed that the targeted high activity zones exceeded occupational exposure limits during demolition exercises. Sound intensity readings were also often above the permissible Lion’s roar 85dB that is dangerous to hearing (Babalola et al., 2023).

Improvements and Prescribed Controls

Based on the survey findings, several recommendations can be made to enhance worker safety and reduce exposure risks:

Improved PPE Utilization: To eliminate problems affecting the use of PPEs, the site management should provide comfortable and easy to use PPEs as well as enhance compliance to the rules on their use. Some new technological developments such as Smart PPEs could also be connected to allow constant monitoring of worker exposure in real time (Rasouli et al., 2024).
Enhanced Training Programs: Other training categories include chemical safety and proper usage of various PPE should not be overlooked. These programs should comprise of practical signifying at some stage optimal ways of handling dangerous materials and routine refreshing courses to ensure that different workers are assured of ability to tackle unfavorable materials (Gupta & Nair, 2023).
Frequent Monitoring: There is need to have frequent air and noise quality checking especially in the areas marked as hazardous; for instance, demolition areas. Continuous monitoring devices for example could offer better protection for the workers (Zhang et al., 2020).
Health Surveillance: The outstanding health risks arising from hazardous exposures would be detected early through the provision of health surveillance programs. Medical check-ups can do much help in early discovery of signs of respiratory disorders or early signs of hearing impairment (Ranasinghe et al., 2023).
Improved Safety Culture: The correct approach to working safety culture should be established, for example by embracing reporting of hazards and reporting of near-miss-occurrences without intimidation. It would aid in timely detecting of risk factors to avoid accidents (Kulinan et al., 2024).

Conclusion

As a result of the occupational hygiene survey conducted in the Commercial Tower Construction Site, several areas of concern regarding the manager of hazardous exposures have been noted. Still, the gaps have been found in the use of PPE, effectiveness of training provided, and suitability of exposure control plans. Dust and noise specific to construction work have been found to regularly go beyond the recommended guidelines, which present threat to the health of the construction workers since the construction workers’ age demographics is generally older than the population in other industries (Ranasinghe et al., 2023). Extended orientation with state-of-art technologies such as BIM and smart personal protective equipment could make a huge impact on safety compliance. However, new air quality and noise checks together with health monitoring programs are also essential for the early signs of health problems detection. That would involve encouraging workers to report incidents that occur at the site and provide an environment where these workers feel safe to report on any hazards that could lead to future accidents. In particularly, it is crucial to solve these problems to achieve the construction environment in which the level of health and safety will be higher (Ebekozien et al., 2024).

References

Babalola, A., Manu, P., Cheung, C., Yunusa-Kaltungo, A. and Bartolo, P., 2023. A systematic review of the application of immersive technologies for safety and health management in the construction sector. Journal of safety research, 85, pp.66-85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437523000075

Cao, D. and Cheng, L., 2024. Interaction effect of building construction accident attributes based on complex network. Process Safety Progress, 43, pp.S293-S303. https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/prs.12556

Chen, P., Fu, G., Wang, Y., Meng, H. and Lv, M., 2023. Accident causation models: A comparison of SCM and 24Model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 237(4), pp.810-822. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1748006X221099094

Delikhoon, M., Zarei, E., Banda, O.V., Faridan, M. and Habibi, E., 2022. Systems thinking accident analysis models: A systematic review for sustainable safety management. Sustainability, 14(10), p.5869. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5869

Deng, J., Liu, S., Shu, Y., Hu, Y., Xie, C. and Zeng, X., 2023. Risk evolution and prevention and control strategies of maritime accidents in China's coastal areas based on complex network models. Ocean & Coastal Management, 237, p.106527. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569123000522

Dobrucali, E., Demirkesen, S., Sadikoglu, E., Zhang, C. and Damci, A., 2024. Investigating the impact of emerging technologies on construction safety performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(3), pp.1322-1347. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ECAM-07-2022-0668/full/html

Dyreborg, J., Lipscomb, H.J., Nielsen, K., Törner, M., Rasmussen, K., Frydendall, K.B., Bay, H., Gensby, U., Bengtsen, E., Guldenmund, F. and Kines, P., 2022. Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews, 18(2), p.e1234. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cl2.1234

Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C., Samsurijan, M.S., Radin Firdaus, R.B. and Rohayati, M.I., 2024. Investigating Safety Violations on Nigerian Construction Sites. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(13), pp.1454-1464. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15623599.2023.2265263

Gupta, S. and Nair, S., 2023. A review of the emerging role of UAVs in construction site safety monitoring. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221478532301177X

Heydari, M., Heravi, G., Raeisinafchi, R. and Karimi, H., 2024. A dynamic model to assess the role of site supervision systems in the safety performance of construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(3), p.04024001. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13810

Huang, R., Liu, H., Ma, H., Qiang, Y., Pan, K., Gou, X., Wang, X., Ye, D., Wang, H. and Glowacz, A., 2022. Accident prevention analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field. Sustainability, 14(14), p.8784. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8784

Jepson, J., Kirytopoulos, K. and Chileshe, N., 2022. Isomorphism within risk-management practices of the Australian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(8), pp.1508-1524. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jacqueline-Jepson/publication/339511334_Isomorphism_within_risk-management_practices_of_the_Australian_construction_industry/links/5e5db5ba92851cefa1d6ae9f/Isomorphism-within-risk-management-practices-of-the-Australian-construction-industry.pdf

Kim, J.M., Adhikari, M.D., Bae, J. and Yum, S.G., 2024. A deep neural network algorithm-based approach for predicting recovery period of accidents according to construction scale. Heliyon. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)08246-X

Kulinan, A.S., Park, M., Aung, P.P.W., Cha, G. and Park, S., 2024. Advancing construction site workforce safety monitoring through BIM and computer vision integration. Automation in Construction, 158, p.105227. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580523004879

Lee, J. and Jeong, J., 2024. Quantitative Accident Risk Estimation for Infrastructure Facilities Based on Accident Case Analysis. Buildings, 14(5), p.1283. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/5/1283/pdf

Liu, C., Li, L., Qiang, Y. and Zhang, S., 2024. Predicting construction accidents on sites: An improved atomic search optimization algorithm approach. Engineering Reports, 6(5), p.e12773. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eng2.12773

Newaz, M.T., Ershadi, M., Jefferies, M. and Davis, P., 2024. A critical review of the feasibility of emerging technologies for improving safety behavior on construction sites. Journal of safety research, 89, pp.269-287. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000495

Oni, O.Z., Olanrewaju, A. and Cheen, K.S., 2024. Identifying key accident causation factors in the Malaysian construction industry. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 30(2), pp.366-377. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khor-Soo-Cheen/publication/377556069_Developing_key_accident_causation_factors_in_Malaysia_construction_industry/links/66cbff6c75613475fe7b7a17/Developing-key-accident-causation-factors-in-Malaysia-construction-industry.pdf

Parsamehr, M., Perera, U.S., Dodanwala, T.C., Perera, P. and Ruparathna, R., 2023. A review of construction management challenges and BIM-based solutions: perspectives from the schedule, cost, quality, and safety management. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(1), pp.353-389. http://tharinducdodanwala.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/s42107-022-00501-4.pdf

Ranasinghe, U., Tang, L.M., Harris, C., Li, W., Montayre, J., de Almeida Neto, A. and Antoniou, M., 2023. A systematic review on workplace health and safety of ageing construction workers. Safety science, 167, p.106276. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753523002187

Rasouli, S., Alipouri, Y. and Chamanzad, S., 2024. Smart Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for construction safety: A literature review. Safety science, 170, p.106368. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753523003107

Rose, R.L., Mugi, S.R. and Saleh, J.H., 2023. Accident investigation and lessons not learned: AcciMap analysis of successive tailings dam collapses in Brazil. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 236, p.109308. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023002223

Shabani, T., Jerie, S. and Shabani, T., 2023. The effectiveness of total loss control approach in accident prevention in industries in Zimbabwe. Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 12(2), pp.93-109. https://www.academia.edu/download/113132495/total_loss.pdf

Simukonda, W. and Emuze, F., 2024. A Perception Survey of Lean Management Practices for Safer Off-Site Construction. Buildings, 14(9), p.2860. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/9/2860

Xuecai, X., Gui, F., Shifei, S., Xueming, S., Jing, L., Lida, H. and Na, W., 2024. Accident case data-accident causation model driven safety training method: targeted safety training empowered by historical accident data in coal industry. Process safety and environmental protection, 182, pp.1208-1226. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582023011606

Yap, J.B.H., Skitmore, M., Lam, C.G.Y., Lee, W.P. and Lew, Y.L., 2024. Advanced technologies for enhanced construction safety management: investigating Malaysian perspectives. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(6), pp.633-642. https://research.bond.edu.au/files/199020313/AM_Advanced_technologies_for_enhanced_construction_safety_management.pdf

Yuxin, W., Gui, F., Qian, L., Jingru, W., Yali, W., Meng, H., Yuxuan, L. and Xuecai, X., 2024. Accident case-driven study on the causal modeling and prevention strategies of coal-mine gas-explosion accidents: A systematic analysis of coal-mine accidents in China. Resources Policy, 88, p.104425. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723011364

Zhang, M., Shi, R. and Yang, Z., 2020. A critical review of vision-based occupational health and safety monitoring of construction site workers. Safety science, 126, p.104658. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753520300552

Zhang, S., Wang, S., Huang, S., Liu, X., Wang, X. and Chen, N., 2024. Optimized deployment strategy for roadside units based on accident risk assessment and simulation validation. IEEE Access, 12, pp.83330-83339. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel8/6287639/10380310/10555225.pdf

Accident Prevention Strategies in Civil Engineering

Table of Contents