Assessment Front Sheet

Assessment Front Sheet



Student First Name


Student Family Name or Surname


Global Banking School ID Number


Programme title

Business & Tourism

Cohort

September 2022

Level

Level 4

Module Number

6

Component of assessment

2

Campus

Choose an item.

Group (e-g; A1, B2, C1 etc)


Assessment’s Word Count


Lecturer’s Name


Student Signature (please type your name)


Date

Click or tap to enter a date.


SShape1



Only Microsoft Word Format is acceptable for uploading summative assignment on Moodle (Turnitin).



CCCU policy on Power Point Presentations: Summative Assignment must contain the speaker notes and your presentation work must be exported to Microsoft Word Format.



Turnitin” is unable to read Apple Macintosh pages format and will not be acceptable for upload.

ubmission Guidelines:









From: (Your Name)

To: Christina Hansen (Operations manager)

Subject: Business Finance


From: (Your Name)

To: Christina Hansen (Operations manager)

Subject: Business Finance

Introduction

The report seeks to measure the performance of 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants for the financial year ended 2019-2023 incorporating the chosen financial ratios about profitability, efficiency, and liquidity, and the analysis of the company's financial risk. It will also explain the financial information needed by various consumers such as the government, suppliers, as well as prospective investors.

Financial Information

Financial information concerns information regarding the firm's financial transactions, including revenues, costs, assets, and liabilities as presented on statements for income statement and balance sheet. This information is fundamental in assisting the stakeholders with the decisions they make about the company concerning its financial position, ability to grow, and efficiency (Fridson and Alvarez, 2022).

Motives of the Stakeholders for Financial Information

HMRC (Government): The government, more so HMRC needs proper financial statements to ascertain if the company has paid the correct amount of tax as well as other external parties such as investors, creditors, and shareholders to make the right decisions about the company. HMRC, therefore can establish the profits of 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants by scrutinizing the balance sheet of the organization, and hence, it will calculate taxes to be paid. They also monitor the financial data of the firm to fulfil the demands of the regulatory bodies and are also able to identify other issues, such as fraud (Hudson, 2018).

DFDS Seaways: In this case, being a business partner or parent company, DFDS Seaways is required to review the financial strength of 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants for strategic development and its alignment with corporate objectives. They go through the financial statements while calculating profitability, efficiency, and overall performance that affects their income and schemes (Tan et al., 2018).

Raw Material Suppliers: The suppliers are concerned with the solvency of the company as well as the solvency of the business to prevent payment delays. Financial statements help them to analyze whether 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants can clear its termly payments so that instances of bad debts can be reduced, and long-term reciprocal relationships can be maintained (Lechler et al., 2020).

Potential Investors: Because of this, the investors use the financial statements to balance the profit-making, growth prospects and the actual rate of returns on investments (ROI). In this scenario, they try to determine the profitable operating profit, net profit and cash flow figures, which determine their investment in the firm (Adhariani and De Villiers, 2019).

Banks and Financial Institutions: While approving these loans, the banks evaluate the company in terms of efficiency in paying back the loans by analyzing the financial position of the company. They measure the firm's ability to meet its obligations and handle the given risks by considering liquidity ratios, high debt, and low profit margins. Link between financial performance and loan bargaining power; Good operational profits and returns improve the firm's prospects regarding better loan rates (Park and Kim, 2020).

Purpose of Financial Information

Every stakeholder group needs financial information to determine if the business is sound from its financial position and performance as well as its cash flows. This gives a business overview of efficiency, profitability, or a business's capacity in the financial period in question or obligation due. This enables the stakeholders to put in place proper investment decisions to either lend, manage, or regulate the company. In the case of firms such as 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants, efficient financial information allows the determination of the financial position and the possibility of growth (Kimmel, Weygandt, and Kieso, 2020). 

Characteristics of Good Financial Information

Relevance: Financial information must be useful in the decision-making process of an organisation.
This makes the stakeholders such as potential investors and banks assess the status of the firms and what to expect in the forthcoming year because current and relevant information is available at such a time. For example, investors may be concerned with the profitability ratios whereas banks may want to analyze the liquidity and the solvency ratios before giving credit. The more useful the data, the more informed the decisions that stakeholders will make based on their financial conditions (Gelinas, Dull, and Wheeler, 2018).

Reliability: In the case of the financial information of the organization, it must be such that it is accurate, consistent, and verifiable, to the point that the stakeholders trust its data.
The data is highly relevant for suppliers and banks because the volume of reliability and creditworthiness of payments depends on financial statements. Where the information proves to be false or conflicting, the followers can be deceived and wrong decisions made. For instance, banks require the accuracy of financial information for them to put into perspective the credit risk levels of the firm before issuing it credit; reliability allows the suppliers to be assured of their payments (Alathamneh, 2020).

Comparability: Comparability enables the stakeholders to compare the firm's previous performance with others. In the case of DFDS Seaways, benchmarking 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants will allow the organization to measure improvement or lack thereof as well as if the company is aligned with objectives and goals. This can be against different financial periods or competitors. Holders also use comparability to determine whether the firm has better returns than other investment opportunities available in the market (Chen et al., 2018).

Understandability: Financial statements should be properly written and in simpler language with the aid of other related financial terms that the users would comprehend. As much as possible, complicated terms must be explained in a way that would make the understanding much simpler. For example, in formulating or preparing financial reports, some potential investors, suppliers and other stakeholders may likely have little understanding of some specific accounting terms or concepts, so if the data is presented/analysed correctly, then it should help them make good decisions. This is very helpful, especially concerning non-financial stakeholders such as DFDS Seaways or Government agencies that depend on noble financial information in grading the issue of sufficiency and appropriateness (Parsa and Sarraf, 2018).


About these characteristics, the information contained within the financial statements is informative, credible, comparable, and understandable by everybody. For instance, while evaluating the risk of a loan, reliability and comparability are highly crucial for banking companies; however, for determining the trend of profitability, relevance and understandability are very critical in the eyes of potential investors.
All of them utilize these attributes to serve their respective goals and to make proper decisions that concern the enterprise (Chen et al., 2018).










Ratios Analysis - 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants






1.



2

3











4

5.

6.







7.

8.



9.



10.




Detailed Analysis of Company's Performance:

The use of ratios is very widespread in financial analysis, as most of them may convey information on some aspect of the organization. It helps many stakeholders make analysis on profitability, operating cost, financial strength and financial sustainability.

Gross Profit Ratio: This means how well a firm is managing it operations to produce its products or deliver its services. It shows how many sales dollars are available for everything else after all the cost of manufacturing or merchandising a product. It is higher where cost control is desired and where firms are more effective in controlling their prices. Operating Profit Ratio: This ratio will inform me how well or otherwise a business has been running in terms of operational cost as compared to the operating revenue. Increase in the scale of operating profit ratio indicates better efficiency in operation whereas low operating profit ration may suggest that the overheads are high, or control measures of cost are not effectively implemented (Choiriyah et al., 2020).

Net Profit Ratio: This shows how much a company earns after all expenses have been paid, taxes provided and interest on borrowings levied, respectively. This reveals the profit by sales dollar, or any other unit that may be used in business. Showing it Gives an indication of the amount of Net Income that can be made for every dollar, or other unit of Sales. A high net profit ratio entails firm is most profitable once all the sundry expenses have been charge

  1. What does each ratio generally explain about a company?

Return on Investment (ROI): Total asset/equity ratio gives information as to how effectively an organization is running to generate revenue out of its total assets. High return on invested capital informs that the resources of the firm are managed successfully to generate returns for the owners of the firm.


Return on Equity (ROE): Income available to common stockholders is computed using one of the widely known financial ratios known as Return on Equity. It is another way of demonstrating more of its operational capacity in utilizing investment resulting from owners’ funds to generate profits. A higher number of ROE, points to better returns it has provided for its investors.

Assets Turnover Ratio: This shows the efficiency with which the firm is using assets in generating sales revenue. A higher turnover ratio suggests the firm assures efficiency of resources employed within the company (Patin, Rahman, and Mustafa, 2020).

Current Ratio: The Working capital ratio seeks to establish how effectively a firm is able to deal with its liabilities by matching the easily readily convertible current assets against the easily portable current liabilities. A higher proportion is always considered optimal and thus a high ratio indicates a strong liquidity condition. Quick Ratio: Unlike the current ratio, inventory and other assets are not factored into such ratios to provide a stricter classification of the ability of the organization to meet its near term obligations.

Equity Ratio: Split of assets that the organisation has invested presents the percentage of owners or shareholders’ funds out of total assets possessed by the organisation. Thus, high equity ratio indicate low credit risk since the company relies more on equity than on debt.

Debt Ratio: This has been taken to mean the proportion level of a firm’s assets financed through borrowings. A low debt ratio is an assurance of low credit risk since the firm depend much on external financing.


ü What does the development in the ratios explain about the company?

The overall financial ratios seen below for 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants show proof of the company’s improvement during the analysed years particularly in the years 2019 to 2023. At the same state, Gross, Operating, and Net Profit Margins were negative in the years 2019 and 2020 which indicates poor efficiency and high cost of the company. However, after 2021, gross profit ratio improved and was 62% and operating profit ratio was better 34% in the year 2023 indicating improved cost management skills and strong operations. This research also demonstrates that the net profit ratio also rose and was equal to 24% in 2023 which illustrates that there was a positive change in the level of organisations’ profitability. There was also a correspondence in the trend of the analysis of the ROI and ROE. As for the Analysis of the shareholders’ returns we can see that both the ROI as well as the ROE were negative in the years 2019 & 2020; however, there is a sign of recovery in the following years where by the year 2023, the ROE would even get to reach 10.35 % High as this would depict better returns for the shareholders and better utilization of the assets of the business. It raised beyond 1 by 2022, the current and the quick ratios depicting the company’s ability to meet short term commitments. This is a sign that there is increased revenue and this is always good for the company since it reduces its rate of vulnerability of the company in terms of its liquidity. The asset turnover ratio has a consistent rising trend during the years, which pointed to the efficient use of assets in generating sales. Holds that the equity ratio will increase in 2022 and 2023 this proves strong equity financing, again, a small debt ratio means small debt financing. This is because lower debt levels mean that there is less credit risk than if the given company is using high debts most of the time hence outcompeting rivals and gaining the attention of investors. Therefore, it was mentioned that the Onboard Restaurants company was very much in a bad shape but has been transformed to be financially sound or a financially healthy company provided that certain measures of financial performance control was upheld to include costs control, assets efficiency and liquidity.


Ratios Analysis

However, ratio analysis has some limitations that one has to bear in mind when undertaking a financial analysis of a firm. First, one can observe ratios Since ratios employ history, they do not reflect future performance. For instance, perhaps owing to economic fluctuations, new market environment or new laws the prior data may not be very helpful in decision making (Kamaluddin, Ishak, and Mohammed, 2019). Secondly, a comparative analysis must take place; however, this may not be an easy task very often. The relative usefulness of the ratios can be possible wherein it is compared with their industry averages Although some companies can have industry characteristics which make them not to be comparable to other companies in the industry such as 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants. In addition, ratios are powerless to distinguish intangibles such as customer satisfaction, morale of employees or market conditions. Some of the above qualitative aspects may significantly affect the performance of a company over the long-term but the may not be observed in the ratios of financial statements (Olayinka, 2022). Another weakness is that inflation rate and accounting facts and figures influence the assessment calculation. Many speci?cs change with inertial growth such that ?uctuations caused by in?ation affect the value of historical ?nancial data and make it less meaningful to compare performance between two different years. Besides, some of the figures in financial statements such as depreciation or inventory valuation, may give a different variety in ratios and lead to inconsistency in analysis. Therefore, to finalise, let us mark the above facts about one of the most used and effective evaluation methodologies of the financial performance, namely, the ratio analysis but at the same time which has some considerable disadvantages. It should be used together with other fundamental/ quantitative and qualitative news on a firm to get a clearer insight on the health of a firm and its future outlook.

Conclusion

Therefore, the concerns on 7 Seas Onboard Restaurants made better and move forward in terms of the gross profit, operating profit, and net profit in five years’ analysis. It also came out well in the aspect of resource utilisation, as inferred by the improved asset turnover and the ROI of the company. Regarding the liquidity position, the current ratios as well as the quick ratios has been above 1 in the later years although there are liabilities which should require some attention. The risk situation of the company has been moderate in relation to the company’s debt to equity ratio, but the fact that the company relies so much on the funds by borrowing helped remain a worry. The suggested recommendations include; the company should focus on cost and revenue control resulting in increased operating profit margins, improvements in the liquidity ratio to enhance short-term solvency and debts should be brought under control resulting in decreased long-term risks. That way, implementation of such strategies will improve the organizations resiliency and subsequent future growth.


Signature and Date

References:

Adhariani, D. and De Villiers, C., (2019). Integrated reporting: perspectives of corporate report preparers and other stakeholders. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal10(1), pp.126-156.

Alathamneh, M., (2020). The impact of accounting information systems reliability on enhancing the requirements of planning process at Jordanian commercial banks. Management Science Letters10(5), pp.1043-1050.

Chen, C.W., Collins, D.W., Kravet, T.D. and Mergenthaler, R.D., (2018). Financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research35(1), pp.164-202.

Chen, C.W., Collins, D.W., Kravet, T.D. and Mergenthaler, R.D., (2018). Financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research35(1), pp.164-202.

Choiriyah, C., Fatimah, F., Agustina, S. and Ulfa, U., (2020). The effect of return on assets, return on equity, net profit margin, earning per share, and operating profit margin on stock prices of banking companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Finance Research1(2), pp.103-123.

Fridson, M.S. and Alvarez, F., (2022). Financial statement analysis: a practitioner's guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Gelinas, U.J., Dull, R.B. and Wheeler, P., (2018). Accounting information systems. Cengage AU.

Hudson, A., (2018). Local Government Finance: Review of Governance and Processes.

Kamaluddin, A., Ishak, N. and Mohammed, N.F., (2019). Financial distress prediction through cash flow ratios analysis. International Journal of Financial Research10(3), pp.63-76.

Kimmel, P.D., Weygandt, J.J. and Kieso, D.E., (2020). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. John Wiley & Sons.

Lechler, S., Canzaniello, A., Wetzstein, A. and Hartmann, E., (2020). Influence of different stakeholders on first-tier suppliers’ sustainable supplier selection: insights from a multiple case study in the automotive first-tier industry. Business Research13, pp.425-454.

Olayinka, A.A., (2022). Financial statement analysis as a tool for investment decisions and assessment of companies’ performance. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management4(1), pp.49-66.

Park, H. and Kim, J.D., (2020). Transition towards green banking: role of financial regulators and financial institutions. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility5(1), pp.1-25.

Parsa, B. and Sarraf, F., (2018). Financial statement comparability and the expected crash risk of stock prices. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications4(3), p.77.

Patin, J.C., Rahman, M. and Mustafa, M., (2020). Impact of total asset turnover ratios on equity returns: Dynamic panel data analyses. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management (JABM)27(1), pp.19-29.

Tan, Y.L., Yusof, M.S., Mohd Ali, N.A. and Mohamed Azmi, Z., (2018). The Influence of Corporate Governance to the Firm Performance in Logistics Industry.

Wahlen, J.M., Baginski, S.P. and Bradshaw, M.T., (2018). Financial reporting, financial statement analysis, and valuation: A strategic perspective. Cengage learning.



2


FAQ's