Strategic Project Management Assessment 3: Statement of Work (SOW)

MBA641_T2_2021_A2_SOW_Template_(Facilitator_Copy_Only)







MBA641

Strategic Project Management



Assessment 3

Statement of Work (SOW)





















Student Name:

Student ID:























Statement of Work (SOW)

Introduction

This statement of work is an Electronic Health Record implementation project for Riverbend Hospital, a well-regarded healthcare organization committed to quality patient care and community well-being. The focus of this project would be on computerizing the health records of patients, which would significantly enhance the level of care, operational efficiencies, and the security of data. By replacing paper-based systems with a digital solution, the hospital aims to minimize errors, enhance access, and make workflows smoother for better experiences for patients. The project will apply the Agile project management methodology so that the implementation proceeds in iterations or phases. This provides flexibility for it to cope with changing needs, integrates continuous stakeholder feedback, and nurtures an environment of collaboration and innovation (Marnada et al. 2022, p. 290). This will be implemented in phases, which would include planning, system integration, training, and continuous monitoring. Each phase is targeted to address the specific problems faced by the hospital, increased competition, security concerns of data, and increased demand for patient care (Rhee et al. 2019, p. 187571). Agile practices for this project mean timely adaptation of patient outcomes and success in the long run.



Name of Project

Riverbend Hospital EHR Implementation Project



Contact


Name / role in organisation

Sponsor:


Riverbend Hospital Senior Management

Stakeholders:


Senior management, IT department, medical and administrative staff, patients, vendors, regulatory bodies

Project Manager:



Project team:


IT experts, training coordinators, medical and administrative staff representatives, vendor account managers



Background (Context)

Riverbend Hospital is a premier provider of healthcare with a commitment to providing quality healthcare services to a population that is both rural and urban. Some areas of health services they provide include emergency care, specialized surgeries, oncology, and cardiac care. This hospital is committed to service in meeting the ever-evolving health needs of its community. As such, increased demands for digital health services, a rise in patient expectations, and competition within the sector make Riverbend Hospital no exception to modernization, to remain competitive.

This could be realized through implementing the strategic step of the EHR system. The initiative would guarantee better care for patients because of real-time access to patient data, less operational inefficiency as a result of automating the process, and more data security that will efficiently protect the information about a patient (Keshta & Odeh 2021, p. 178). The management of the hospital has engaged in this implementation using the Agile approach. Agile is an iterative framework that supports the adoption of phased development, stakeholder feedback, and quick adaptation to changing requirements (Marnada et al., 2022, p. 290). By embracing this approach, Riverbend Hospital has set out to enhance its patient outcomes, streamline healthcare processes, and ensure the highest standards in both care and operational efficiency (Rhee et al., 2019, p.187571).



Purpose and Scope

The Electronic Health Records implementation will revolutionize health services at Riverbend Hospital through digitalization of all patient records for better patient care, including data management. The project would aim to enhance patient care, facilitate easy access to data, operational efficiency as well as data security, which would increase the patient experience. The project will involve the planning phase, which includes the actual system development, staff training, testing, monitoring, and continuous maintenance. It will be implemented in cooperation with all key stakeholders involved in this transition process, such as the senior management, medical and administrative staff, patients, and vendors, to ensure full cooperation. This would align their effort toward making sure the project articulates with the strategic goals of the hospital and fosters seamless adoption throughout the organization. The hospital is making attempts by embracing this approach to excel in patient care and simultaneously simplifying the internal process for healthy outcomes.


Requirements

Technical Infrastructure Upgrade: The proposed system of EHR requires an upgrade to the current infrastructure of IT within the hospital to ensure that it is compatible and works efficiently.

Training Sessions: The staff training sessions are the comprehensive training programs that need to be imparted among medical and administrative staff to ensure that there is no misuse of the EHR system (Ngugi, Were & Babic 2021, p.8) and errors are reduced to a minimum.

Compliance with Regulations: The EHR system shall follow the set regulations concerning healthcare data security, such as HIPAA, to protect patient information and ensure legal non-disclosure (Yigzaw et al. 2022, p.12).

Vendor Collaboration: Collaboration with the EHR vendor is very helpful toward effective system integration, troubleshooting, and constant technical support throughout the entire course of the project life cycle (Beauvais et al. 2021).



Scope of Work

To Be Done


Resources Needed

Outcome

Time Involved

General Steps

Planning and scoping

Project manager, IT team, and stakeholders

Complete project scope and objectives

Month 1

Execute initial stakeholder meetings to collect input.

Define project objectives and scope clearly.

Develop a comprehensive project plan outlining timelines and resources.

Staff training and development

Training Coordinator and IT experts

Trained staff capable of EHR use

Months 5-6

Create training modules and user guides.

Schedule and conduct training sessions for employees.

Collect feedback from trainees to improve training materials.

System integration and testing

IT team and vendor account manager

Efficient system integration and error-free performance

Months 4-5

Install EHR software and organize settings.

Perform comprehensive testing and troubleshooting of the system.

Document problems and resolutions during testing.

Monitoring and adjustments

IT team and project manager

System functioning properly and issues addressed

Ongoing

Supervise system performance and collect user feedback.

Address any technical glitches and make necessary modifications.

Execute periodic reviews of system effectiveness.

Full system launch

Project team

Fully operational EHR system

Month 7

Officially launch the EHR system across all departments.



Location and project team

Site

Duration


Office


Hospital IT department and project management office

Project team


IT experts, project managers, medical staff councils, vendor representatives, and trainers

Required team

(define here the expertise needed)

IT system integration, EHR software skills, medical training, and data security



Deliverables

Deliverable

Objective

Due Date


Detailed Project Plan

Define project scope and roadmap

End of Month 1

Staff Training Plan

Ensure staff eagerness for the EHR system

Month 5

Integrated EHR System

System integration and testing

End of Month 6

Compliance and Security Audit Report

Ensure loyalty to regulations

Month 7

Final Project Report

Recap project conclusions and metrics

Month 7



Schedule

Phases


Description

Start date

Finish date

Phase 1: Project Planning and Scope Definition

Conduct Initial Stakeholder Meetings

Outline Project Scope and Objectives

Develop a Detailed Project Plan



Milestone 1: Approval of project plan and scope

Plan about the project and define the scope of the project. Engage with key stakeholders to gather input and establish project goals (Sweet 2021, p.4). Outline the scope of the EHR implementation and set measurable objectives. Create a complete plan detailing tasks, timelines, and resource allocation.


Month 1

Month 1

Phase 2: Staff Training and System Preparation

Advance Training Materials
Schedule Training Sessions for Staff

Prepare IT Infrastructure for EHR System

Milestone 2: Completion of staff training and IT preparation

Train the staff and the system in question. Develop a user manual, a quick reference guide, and a training presentation on the use of the EHR system. Schedule and announce the availability of training sessions for all concerned medical and administrative staff. Ensure that hardware and network configurations meet the specifications of the EHR system (Abul-Husn & Kenny, 2019, p. 58).

Month 2

Month 4

Phase 3: System Integration and Testing

Install EHR Software and Configure System

Conduct System Testing and Troubleshooting

Collect Feedback from Staff During Testing

Milestone 3: Successful completion of system integration testing

Vendors shall install and set up EHR software, ensuring it meets every specific need and guideline that the hospital may have. Conduct an intensive test of the EHR system on the site to see problems and fix them before going live. Engage the staff so they can provide feedback about the usability and functionality of the system in the testing phase.

Month 4

Month 5

Phase 4: Monitoring and Adjustments

Monitor System Performance and User Adoption

Address Technical Issues

Gather Feedback from Users for Improvements

Milestone 4: Final adjustments based on feedback

Follow through on the system performance indicators to assess effectiveness and user engagement (Sheldon, Kinza Yasar & Stedman 2024). Also, consider any technical problems that may arise and make changes to the system as needed. Request feedback from staff for further refinement before final implementation.

Month 5

Month 6

Phase 5: Go Live and Final Evaluation

Launch EHR System Hospital-Wide

Conduct Final Evaluation of Project Outcomes and Success Metrics

Prepare Final Project Report and Documentation

Milestone 5: Project completion and closure

Implement an EHR system across all hospital departments. Compare the overall success of the project at the end of the effort against the objectives, and measurements established at the outset. Write a final report compiling project documentation, lessons learned, and performance evaluations.

Month 6

Month 7



Define Success Criteria

Seamless integration of the system: The EHR system should be integrated into existing IT infrastructure smoothly, with minimal barriers to data flow, and in such a way that no disruption of operations occurs within the hospital.

Competency of staff: This would include both medical and administrative personnel who can use the EHR system efficiently for appropriate adoption.

Administrative Burden Reduction: Implementation of the EHR system shall reduce administrative work burdens (Cerchione et al. 2023, p.13), enabling staff to pay more attention to patient care.

Compliance: The project should ensure full compliance with healthcare data regulations such as HIPAA (Yigzaw et al., 2022, p.12) and should not give way to any data breach regarding security and privacy.



Reporting and Communications


Weekly Progress Reports: The project manager is supposed to submit a comprehensive report to the senior management every week. This report will showcase the status regarding EHR implementation, what milestones and challenges (Oleribe et al. 2019, p. 395) were faced during the week, and what forthcoming tasks are proposed to work on the principle of transparency and accountability.


Monthly System Performance and Training Evaluation Reports: These reports will be utilized to identify the system performance of the EHR and the effectiveness of the training programs (Mus et al., 2023, p.1552) that have taken place. These reports will include metrics such as the time the system has been 'up,' user adoption rates, and staff proficiency to keep management successfully making the decisions for any adjustments that may be needed (Musa et al. 2023, p.1552).


Standards and Testing

Standard/Test


Team Member or Team

Due Date

System Integration Testing

IT Team and Vendor Councils

Month 5

Staff Expertise Test

Training Coordinator

Month 6



Budget Outline

The estimated total budget for EHR implementation covers certain key elements on IT infrastructure upgrade, EHR software procurement, training of the staff, and consultancy services from third-party vendors (Aiming, 2023, p.39). It has been a comprehensive budget that has taken into consideration all resources that will be necessary for the successful execution and sustainability of the project. The estimated breakdown is as follows:


  • IT Infrastructure: $100,000 will go to enhance the hardware and upgrade the network so that the new setup can be supported.

  • Software and Vendor Services: $150,000, which includes the purchase costs of the EHR software and ongoing vendor services.

  • Staff Training: $50,000, for extensive training programs aimed at equipping staff with all relevant skills that shall be used in interacting and operating an EHR system.

  • Contingency: $ 30,000, to be used in case of unexpected expenses or obstacles while implementing.

  • Total: $330,000, this is the overall investment that will be required for the implementation of this EHR system successfully at Riverbend Hospital. This is the budget to keep closely monitored and to make adjustments whenever necessary to ensure project success.


Payment-schedule

Who

How Much

Payment Due

Vendor

$75,000


IT Infrastructure

$100,000


Training Coordinator

$20,000


Vendor (Support)

$30,000


Closure

Document


Signed Off

System Integration Report

Yes

Training Completion Report

Yes

Compliance Audit Report

Yes



Closing Statement

The project of implementing EHR for Riverbend Hospital is a strategic undertaking that offers the opportunity to transition patient records into a digital format, improving the level of patient care while efficiency improves through the process (Abul-Husn & Kenny 2019, p. 58). With Agile project management methodologies, the hospital engages itself in a continued ability to adapt to changing requirements and ensures active stakeholder participation throughout the life cycle of the project. This adaptive approach supports flexibility for the project team to respond to feedback and modify the development process as necessary on time. As a result, the implementation of the EHR system would be successful, thus enabling Riverbend Hospital to achieve its strategic goals through better patient care and enhanced efficiency, reduced administrative burdens, and cultivating a culture of innovation within the organization. This project is feasible and also aligns with the strategic long-term plan of the hospital. If the resources are available, stakeholders are committed, and a concrete implementation plan is ready, then Riverbend Hospital will witness phenomenal development in its model of healthcare delivery.




References



Abul-Husn, N S & Kenny, E E 2019, ‘Personalized medicine and the power of electronic health records,’ Cell, vol. 177, no. 1, pp.58-69. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:I3iOd_zXjlcJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=5999611336680443774&oi=lle>.

Aiming, G 2023, ‘The healthcare information sharing based on the third party in China: A hospital perspective’. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/31254/1/phd_gu_aiming.pdf>.

Beauvais, B Kruse, C S Fulton, L Shanmugam, R Ramamonjiarivelo, Z & Brooks, M 2021, ‘Association of electronic health record vendors with hospital financial and quality performance: retrospective data analysis,’ Journal of medical Internet research, vol. 23, no. 4, p.e23961. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23961/>.

Cerchione, R Centobelli, P Riccio, E Abbate, S & Oropallo, E 2023, ‘Blockchain’s coming to hospital to digitalize healthcare services: Designing a distributed electronic health record ecosystem,’ Technovation, vol. 120, p.102480. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S016649722200027X>.

Keshta, & Odeh, A 2021, ‘Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges,’ Egyptian Informatics Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, 177-183. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866520301365>.

Marnada, P Raharjo, T Hardian, B & Prasetyo, A 2022, ‘Agile project management challenge in handling scope and change: A systematic literature review,’ Procedia Computer Science, vol. 197, pp.290-300. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705092102367X/pdf?md5=92918da4b5adac62c28aa2cfdeff4363&pid=1-s2.0-S187705092102367X-main.pdf>.

Musa, S Dergaa, I Al Shekh Yasin, R & Singh, R 2023, ‘The impact of training on electronic health records related knowledge, practical competencies, and staff satisfaction: a pre-post intervention study among wellness center providers in a primary health-care facility,’ Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, pp.1551-1563. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2147/jmdh.s414200>.

Ngugi, P N Were, M C & Babic, A 2021, ‘Users’ perception on factors contributing to electronic medical records systems use: a focus group discussion study in healthcare facilities setting in Kenya,’ BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 21, pp.1-14. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12911-021-01737-x.pdf>.

Oleribe, O O Momoh, J Uzochukwu, B S Mbofana, F Adebiyi, A Barbera, T & Taylor-Robinson, S D 2019, ‘Identifying key challenges facing healthcare systems in Africa and potential solutions,’ International Journal of General Medicine, pp.395-403. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2147/IJGM.S223882>.

Rhee, C Jones, T M Hamad, Y Pande, A Varon, J O’Brien, C & Klompas, M 2019, ‘Prevalence underlying causes and preventability of sepsis-associated mortality in US acute care hospitals,’ JAMA Network Open, vol. 2(2), p.187571. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/articlepdf/2724768/rhee_2019_oi_180313.pdf>

Sheldon, R Kinza Yasar & Stedman, C 2024, ‘What is a key performance indicator (KPI)? Strategy and guide,’ Business Analytics. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://www.techtarget.com/searchbusinessanalytics/definition/key-performance-indicators-KPIs>.

Sweet, T 2021, ‘Benefits of Technology Integration in a Small Behavioral Health Organization,’ (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12689&context=dissertations>.

Yigzaw, K Y Olabarriaga, S D Michalas, A Marco-Ruiz, L Hillen, C Verginadis, Y De Oliveira, M T Krefting, D Penzel, T Bowden, J & Bellika, J G 2022, ‘Health data security and privacy: Challenges and solutions for the future,’ Roadmap to Successful Digital Health Ecosystems, pp.335-362. Viewed on 7 October 2024 <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yySCtuCjq0CJYB0DUFxmx7IS9Q0MheAX/view>.









7


FAQ's