HS7022
Project Management
T2 (Individual)
Student Name:
Student ID:
Introduction
Control of the project scope is one of the very most important success factors in any project, as it enables one to remain focused on the objectives while allowing necessary changes. Within the Agile methodologies, SCRUM is widely recognized to allow the teams to easily adjust to changed requirements. At the same time, this flexibility entails a very real risk of so-called scope creep, which can blow up project timetables and budgets. Holmes Software Technologies has adopted the implementation of SCRUM for developing its ERP solution. It is dreaded that the scope changes will be more frequent than as compared to traditional methodologies. This report debates how SCRUM manages the scope changes, the challenges in managing them, and how project scope may be kept under control. It critically discusses the literature to shed light on best practice guidelines that balance flexibility against the need to effectively control project scope in SCRUM.
Literature Review
In this paper, SCRUM methodology is briefly reviewed as an Agile framework by emphasizing its iterative process and flexibility. Most importantly, SCRUM operates on short, time-boxed iterations called sprints, whereby teams constantly improve their work through feedback (Daraojimba et al., 2024, p191(2)). Key roles include the Scrum Master, Product Owner, and the Development Team greatly aid in managing the tasks at hand within the project and aligning them with project goals (Daraojimba et al., 2024, p193(2)). Daily stand-up meetings and sprint reviews are some of the key practices that enhance transparency within SCRUM, adaptability, and continuous improvement (Daraojimba et al., 2024, p192(1)). Such a flexible and customer-oriented approach also has its distresses: it may offer some resistance to change, or issues related to scalability, especially in large-sized or distributed teams (Daraojimba et al., 2024, p192(3)). The iterative nature of Scrum makes it effective under dynamic environments wherein changes in project requirements are more frequent.
Scope Management: Agile vs. Traditional Methodologies
It provides a comparative analysis of the scope of Agile and traditional project management methodologies, outlining key differences. The nature of scope in SCRUM and other Agile methodologies is such that scope changes are expected and welcomed. Thus, projects change with customer feedback through iterative development phases (Marnada et al., 2022, p291(1)). This contrasts with more traditional methodologies like PRINCE2, which considers changes in scope as risks to be minimized, using predefined processes with great care. Agile methodologies have very frequent interactions between stakeholders and can have scope adjustments at the end of each iteration. Traditional processes define the scope at the beginning of the project and ensure there is less resistance to changes while it is in progress (Marnada et al., 2022, p292(2)). Although Agile allows for much flexibility, the paper notices certain challenges it faces, such as uncontrolled changes of scope that may result in project delays and increased budgets, especially in highly regulated industries (Marnada et al., 2022, p291(3)).
Agility and Adaptability of SCRUM in Managing Scope Changes
SCRUM is flexible and adaptable, setting it up to be pretty perfect for scope change management. In contrast to methods like Waterfall, where requirements in constant evolution may be problematic, the iterative nature of SCRUM allows teams to respond rather promptly to such changes in needs. According to McCutcheon (2021), SCRUM ensures constant reevaluation and prioritization through short feedback loops and sprint reviews that help to control the scope changes without putting the success of the project at risk (McCutcheon, 2021, p5(3)).
Moreover, SCRUM allows for collaboration with stakeholders in the development of a project, and all scope changes can easily be integrated during the development time, the project will be able to deliver valuable increments even before shifting requirements are met (McCutcheon, 2021, p9(4)). This is inclusive of the fact that a self-organizing SCRUM team is empowered to take immediate action concerning new information or goals so that it only causes less disruption though full concentration on the project's objectives is maintained (McCutcheon, 2021, p7(3)). Thus, with SCRUM, the framework proves to be effective in diverse complex situations of scope changes.
Techniques and Practices for Handling Scope Changes in SCRUM
According to the project management report (2019), effective handling of scope changes within SCRUM would be a balancing act process that is flexible yet controlled. The main thing in such a practice is defining the Product Backlog and managing it, which lists all the features and requirements, teams operating within sprints must iteratively handle scope changes. Each sprint provides the team with an opportunity to reconsider priorities and adapt to any emerging new requirements
this is consistent with the core agile principles that welcome change even at the later stages of product development. Other important techniques include regular sprint reviews, where stakeholders are engaged and provide an opportunity for reviewing changes against project objectives, ensuring continuity of alignment on targeting project objectives without derailing the project.
SCRUM teams are meant to follow strict change management processes to avoid scope creep. This comprises recording requests for scope changes and impact assessments, followed by the incorporation of approved changes in a controlled manner. Strong communication with stakeholders on such reviews ensures that changes are kept under control, reducing associated risks in expanding the scope.
Impact of Scope Changes on SCRUM Project Success
Against such factors, scope change- especially scope creep-are increasingly influencing the success of SCRUM projects according to Komal et al. (2020), one of the dominating reasons for project failure in software, which again determines delay and cost increments while reducing customer satisfaction, is scope creep (Komal et al., 2020, p125755(1)). Poor management of the scope has often led to uncontrolled changes which directly compromise the success of the project (Komal et al., 2020, p125757(2)). Even though SCRUM presents room for flexibility, frequent requirement changes challenge this framework until, in most cases, the efficiency decreases and the timeline gets extended. Apart from this, other influences like a requirement for volatility and poor initial scope definition worsen the impacts of scope changes in SCRUM projects (Komal et al., 2020, p125764(4)). Even though SCRUM allows adaptive approaches to planning, constant changes without controls will finally result in scope creep that may compromise the success of a project in the shortest time (Komal et al., 2020, p125762(2)). Proper scope management and discipline in dealing with change are worth ensuring that SCRUM project success prevails. Komal et al. (2020, p125764(2)).
Agile Project Management Across Different Levels
(Scholz et al., 2020, p 237(3)), Focus on one of the use cases which is the introduction of an Industry 4.0 Learning Factory in China adopting agile project management methodologies. Currently, the authors discuss how different methodologies, more specifically SCRUM, might be implemented cross-cultural in complex projects. These include recognition of agility in accommodating dynamic environment capture requirements and further extended stakeholders. Some of the key suggestions that the study puts across include communication, an iterative process, and feedback on changes in scope. As their research shows, the agile methodologies were more effective in addressing the risks and changes more effectively than the conventional practices. However, they pointed out that there were significant issues in how organizational agility works in the Chinese business environment, implying that there might be a need to perform a cultural suitability check before adopting agility, especially in the global realms.
Technical Dependencies in Large-Scale Projects
Drawing from an extensive empirical study of three large-scale Agile projects, (Berntzen et al. 2021, p 142(1)) explore how coordination happens particularly across multiple teams. The research provides an insight into the main coordination challenges that characterize multi-team SCRUM projects to include; dependencies, communication breakdown, and goal incongruence amongst others. The authors also provide recommendations on how these challenges could be eliminated: providing for the identification of coordination roles, adopting best practices, and creating a common understanding of the goals of projects. Above all, it remains the focus on the need to avoid misunderstanding, and excess of concentrating solely on the formal coordination mechanisms of the activity, together with the inherent flexibility, inherent in AGILE methodologies. According to the paper, inter-team coordination should be used when dealing with scope changes in large-scale agile projects because the changes can be made faster and the work of all the teams involved can be better coordinated.
Overscoping in Large Software Projects
New product development often results in extending the features of the product beyond its specifications which is the subject of (Marzi, 2022, p. 15(4)) study. The paper also looks at how over-featuring can be addressed or enhanced when implementing agile models such as SCRUM. This is the author’s view on how flexibility and customer orientation promoted by agile processes lead to the constant addition of new features with low priority. This paper presents a conceptual framework to manage both innovation and scope in agile projects. It is critical for a backlog to be refined more often and have effective product owners to reduce capturing too much scope. According to Marzi’s study, the idea of how to successfully manage the scope in SCRUM projects involves the enhancement of flexibility in addition to overemphasizing change while at the same time avoiding the temptation to expand the features to be developed in the project.
Scope Management in Agile Methodologies
The paper by (Perkusichet et al., 2020, p. 13(4)) is a systematic literature review that focuses on the problem of managing scope and change within agile project management. The authors synthesize the data using 30 works to define common tendencies and recommendations for scope management within the unlocked methodologies, particularly SCRUM. Many are outlined as critical, of which stakeholder management, identification and prioritization of requirements, and the ability to maintain project velocity in light of change are most important. The review therefore sums up different approaches on how to manage scope in agile projects including change control procedures, stakeholder communication, and use of agile estimate. The paper also notes that, although actively following agile such as SCRUM allows scope flexibility to meet continuous change, some rules and regulations need to be followed to avoid excessive scope changes and consequent project failure.
Comparison Between Traditional and Agile Methodologies
(Papadakis & Tsironis, 2020, p 127(2)) Attempt a systematic review of the literature to examine different research studies on integrational methods of both conventional and agile project management systems. It is useful specifically for exploring how approaches like SCRUM can be either extended or used in conjunction with other methods to address the problem of scope change. To provide greater clarity for the nomenclature for hybrid frameworks, the authors highlight typical features that comprise loose definitions of the scope, cyclic planning, and constant engagement of stakeholders. They argue that hybrid approaches can offer the best of both worlds: In other words, traditional structures and the provided agile flexibility were compared. According to the paper, such hybrid frameworks could be useful in sphere of scope changes in complex projects when it is problematic to use pure SCRUM. The authors also discuss how implementing hybrid approaches depends on organizational culture and the context of the project.
Discussion
Literature has also identified that SCRUM's iterative framework offers considerable advantages over the traditional scope change management methodologies like Waterfall and PRINCE2, as SCRUM offers continuous feedback and adjustment in line with emerging requirements explored by Daraojimba et al., 2024, p91(2)) and Marnada et al., 2022, p291(1)). Involving stakeholders in sprint reviews helps to make the changes smoothly and in line with the project goals (McCutcheon, 2021, p9(4)).
However, some of the challenges still exist in uncontrolled scope changes that have been responsible for delays and cost overruns of projects. This therefore calls for effective management techniques in scope control through best-defined product backlogs and formal change management processes put in place to manage the scope, as noted by Daraojimba et al., 2024, p192(1)) and Komal et al., 2020, p125764(2)). Scope management under the SCRUM framework requires discipline if the project is to succeed while accommodating changes.
The research papers presented herein shed light on key aspects of agile project management specifically about the management of the project scope and interaction with other teams. Several studies noted that the main focus should be on integrating intelligent software engineering with agile processes, as automation and data analytics brought benefits to the improvement of decision-making. The practical implication of using agile is well demonstrated by Scholz et al. who reveal how it works in an Industry 4.0 context, especially in a volatile environment.
However, as stated by Berntzen et al, authors, large-scale agile initiatives are always associated with major coordination issues that may become barriers to success. This is coupled with an element of scope creep, as discussed by Komal et al. and Maranda et al. because it can cause project derailment. This is where the project management framework that was presented by Papadakis and Tsironis can be a useful approach: it is a mixture of both, the traditional and agile approaches.
Following the same framework, Daraojimba et al. give a clear discussion on agile methodologies, and they emphasize the aspect that different agile approaches ought to be adapted to match the undertakings of the project. This paper contributes to this line of thinking by providing insight into over-featuring in new product development where Marzi (2022) argues that its occurrence worsens scope management challenges. Taken together, these papers suggest how it is critical to effectively plan and integrate the sweeping process changes occurring in agile project management methodologies while avoiding associated threats to project success.
Conclusion
Effective scope management plays a crucial role in project success when embarking on SCRUM-based projects where the work environment is so dynamic and requirements change frequently. The literature review emphasized that due to the innate flexibility of SCRUM, teams can adapt to changed scopes via iterative sprints and continuous feedback with various stakeholders. This agility opens up communication lines to ensure the projects can serve consumer needs as they evolve. This flexibility brings along its challenges, which include the very real chances of scope creep, significant delays, and cost overruns. Evidence from studies shows that poorly managed scopes have often led to uncontrolled changes in projects that affect the success of the project. The adoption of systematic practices here, such as a well-defined Product Backlog and adherence to formal processes for change management, will help to reduce these risks. Such strategies will help these teams manage their scope effectively while accommodating required adjustments.
Further scope management control can be achieved by incorporation of Agile methodologies into traditional frameworks of project management. Companies like Holmes Software Technologies are adopting SCRUM for their ERP solutions; a disciplined approach toward scope management would, therefore, become imperative in achieving project objectives and ascertaining stakeholder satisfaction. Further research directions should focus on how hybrid methodologies ensure the enhancement of scope management in project environments characterized by diversity.
References
Berntzen, M., Stray, V. & Moe, N.B. 2021. Coordination strategies: managing inter-team coordination challenges in large-scale agile, In International Conference on Agile Software Development, pp. 140-156). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_9.pdf
Daraojimba, E.C., Nwasike, C.N., Adegbite, A.O., Ezeigweneme, C.A. & Gidiagba, J.O. 2024. Comprehensive review of agile methodologies in project management, Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5(1), pp.190-218. https://fepbl.com/index.php/csitrj/article/view/717/905
Komal, B., Janjua, U.I., Anwar, F., Madni, T.M., Cheema, M.F., Malik, M.N. & Shahid, A.R., 2020. The impact of scope creep on project success: An empirical investigation, IEEE Access, 8, pp.125755-125775. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/8948470/09133081.pdf
Marnada, P., Raharjo, T., Hardian, B. & Prasetyo, A. 2022. Agile project management challenge in handling scope and change: A systematic literature review, Procedia Computer Science, 197, pp.290-300. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705092102367X/pdf?md5=92918da4b5adac62c28aa2cfdeff4363&pid=1-s2.0-S187705092102367X-main.pdf
Marzi, G. 2022. On the Nature of Over Featuring in the New Product Development Process, PROCEEDINGS-ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT, pp.1-41. https://arts.units.it/bitstream/11368/3022951/3/14350.pdf
McCutcheon, M.R. and Bunch, W. 2021. The Advantages of Managing IT Projects Using Agile/Scrum. https://matt0523.github.io/McCutcheon_Capstone%20Final%20Draft.edited.pdf
Papadakis, E. & Tsironis, L. 2020. Towards a hybrid project management framework: A systematic literature review on traditional, agile and hybrid techniques, The Journal of Modern Project Management, 8(2). https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/download/JMPM02410/394
Perkusich, M., e Silva, L.C., Costa, A., Ramos, F., Saraiva, R., Freire, A., Dilorenzo, E., Dantas, E., Santos, D., Gorgônio, K. & Almeida, H. 2020. Intelligent software engineering in the context of agile software development: A systematic literature review, Information and Software Technology, 119, p.106241. https://www.academia.edu/download/114211880/j.infsof.2019.10624120240506-1-1rwpuh.pdf
Projectmanagementreport.com. 2019. Effective Techniques for Handling Scope Changes in Project Management - Project Management Report. https://projectmanagementreport.com/blog/scope-change
Scholz, J.A., Sieckmann, F. & Kohl, H. 2020. Implementation with agile project management approaches Case Study of an Industrie 4.0 Learning Factory in China, Procedia Manufacturing, 45, pp.234-239. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978920311422/pdf?md5=cfc443ef8adecc6e7a78cff036341a0c&pid=1-s2.0-S2351978920311422-main.pdf
