Table of Contents
Week 1. The meaning of Inclusion. 3
Week 2: Equality and the Law. 5
Week 3: The Business case for Diversity. 7
Week 4: Segregation and sociological approaches to inequality in organizations. 9
Week 5: An Intersectional approach. 11
Week 6: Gender inequalities: Choice and constraints. 13
Week 7: Social mobility and the class gap. 15
Week 8: Migration and race inequality in employment. 17
Week 9: Age Diversity and inclusion. 19
Week 10: LGBT and inclusion and Disability and Neuro-diversity. 21
Week 1. The meaning of Inclusion.
1. |
Define the concept of Inclusion. Describe how inclusion is different from Diversity and Equal Opportunities using examples? |
Cultivating an atmosphere where everybody, despite differences, feels appreciated, respected, and encouraged is referred to as inclusion. No matter their ethnicity, gender, age, ability, or any other attribute, it means making sure that everyone has the same chances and resources (Hudson, 2022). |
2. |
Give three reasons why inclusivity may not lead to equality in the workplace? |
There are several reasons why inclusivity may not necessarily lead to equality in the workplace: |
Week 2: Equality and the Law.
1. |
Explain the weaknesses of the ‘liberal’ approach for creating diversity and change in education and organizations in the UK? Provide some examples. |
Due to systemic inequalities, the "liberal" approach to fostering diversity and change in UK organisations and education makes the false assumption that all individuals have the same starting position and access to opportunity. It can also promote tokenism since it places more emphasis on individual success than on systemic change. Tokenism examples include companies filling quotas for diversity by recruiting a token number of people from underrepresented groups without addressing the root causes of prejudice (Huziej, 2022). Realizing and addressing structural injustices as well as challenging pre-existing power structures and institutions are crucial for bringing about true and long-lasting change. |
2. |
Outline the strengths and weaknesses of the Equality Act 2010? Critically assess how the Equality Act of 2010 improves individuals’ protection from discrimination in the workplace? |
The Equality Act of 2010 sets up an extensive framework for safeguarding persons against discrimination based on protected characteristics such as age, colour, gender, disability, belief, and sexual orientation ()Mason and Minerva, 2022). The Act's comprehensive coverage of many sorts of discrimination, emphasis on encouraging equality and diversity, and mechanisms for legal remedies and enforcement are among its many virtues. However, there are certain flaws, like a lack of understanding in certain areas, for example the concept of indirect discrimination, as well as the intricacy of the legal system, which may be hard for people to navigate. |
Week 3: The Business case for Diversity
1. |
What is the Business case for diversity management in the workplace? Give examples of positive arguments for Business diversity in organizations? |
A diverse workforce may contribute a variety of viewpoints and experiences, which can boost creativity, innovation, and productivity, according to the business case for diversity management in the workplace (weforum.org, 2019). Organizations may boost staff morale and retention levels by fostering an inclusive and welcoming atmosphere for people from all backgrounds. A varied staff may also aid businesses in better understanding and serving a diverse clientele. |
2. |
What are the criticisms of Business case diversity? Why despite diversity policies, are women who work flexibly/and or part-time under-represented in senior management in organizations? |
Critics of the business case for diversity argue that it reduces diversity to a matter of economics, overlooking the moral and ethical imperatives of creating a fair and inclusive workplace. They argue that diversity should be valued for its own sake, rather than simply as a means of improving the bottom line. |
Week 4: Segregation and sociological approaches to inequality in organizations.
1. |
Explain the rationale for segregation in the labour market using either economic or sociological theories? |
Segregation in the labor market can be explained by both economic and sociological theories. Economic theory suggests that employers use observable characteristics such as race, gender, and age as proxies for unobservable characteristics such as productivity and work ethic. This leads to segregation in the labor market as employers make assumptions about the performance and productivity of certain groups based on stereotypes, rather than actual ability. Sociological theory suggests that individuals and groups seek to maintain their position in society by limiting access to resources and opportunities to those who share their social characteristics. This leads to segregation in the labor market as individuals from certain social groups face barriers to entry or advancement due to discrimination or lack of access to opportunities (Tonoyan, Strohmeyer and Jennings, 2020). |
2. |
How do cultural capitals (Bourdieu, 1986) reproduce class privilege in education and the workplace? Give three examples using a cultural capital. |
According to Pierre Bourdieu's theory of cultural capital, certain cultural knowledge, skills, and practices are valued and rewarded in society, and those who possess them have an advantage in education and the workplace. Cultural capital can be passed down from generation to generation and can reproduce class privilege (Claussen and Osborne, 2013).
|
Week 5: An Intersectional approach
1. |
Explain how Intersectionality offered a different approach compared to the traditional feminist perspective in the US? |
Theoretical framework known as intersectionality was developed in the US in the late 1980s and early 1990s in response to the limits of conventional feminist viewpoints. The classic feminist viewpoint tended to emphasise gender as the main axis of oppression and neglected the ways that other kinds of identity and oppression, like race, class, and sexuality, interact with gender (Nash, 2008).
|
2. |
Define an Inequality regime according to Acker (2006)? Give two examples, of how an inequality regime (Acker, 2006) makes invisible and legitimate; gender, race or class inequalities in an organization? |
An inequality regime, according to Acker (2006), is a set of behaviours, rules, and procedures used by an organisation to establish and sustain gender, racial, or class disparities (Olofsdotter, Bolin and Mathiassen, 2023). Such regimes are frequently covert and given legitimacy by widely held presumptions and beliefs. Policies that reward employees for putting in long hours, for instance, may unintentionally harm individuals who must take care of others, like parents, and entrench gender and class disparities. Similar to this, discrimination against members of disadvantaged groups may be sustained through recruiting practises that rely on arbitrary standards like "culture fit." In both examples, the inequality regime operates invisibly and legitimizes gender, race, or class inequalities within the organization. |
Week 6: Gender inequalities: Choice and constraints
1. |
Explain Hakim’s (2006) preference theory? Do all women with children or caring responsibilities, make a choice to give up their career? How does this differ from Ackers (2006) ‘unencumbered male performance standard’? Discuss using examples. |
Hakim's (2006) preference theory posits that women's choices to work or not work are primarily influenced by their personal preferences, rather than systemic barriers. She argues that women fall into three groups: work-oriented, family-oriented, and adaptive women who balance both. This theory suggests that not all women with caring responsibilities give up their career, and some may choose to prioritize their career over family commitments (Leahy and Doughney, 2006). |
2. |
Undertake a Diversity Audit of an organization. Either one you know of; or using the internet to get information. For example, company reports. |
The international consumer products corporation Unilever is dedicated to workplace inclusion, equity, as well as diversity. To combat racism and discrimination, they have designed an Equality & Inclusive Advancement Framework and identified key areas of under-representation. Throughout its management, Unilever has maintained a gender balance. The firm employs gender-balanced succession planning as well as balanced slates in recruiting to encourage gender diversity, and senior female representation has climbed to 31%. By 2025, the firm wants 5% of its employees to be individuals with disabilities. To that end, it is gathering employee self-reported data on disability and striving to make its technology and website more accessible. A vibrant LGBTQI+ network within Unilever supports education and community development. A more thorough evaluation of the organization's diversity and inclusion initiatives would be possible with more details on the proportion of racial and ethnic minorities in the firm, especially at the senior level (unilever.com, 2023). |
Week 7: Social mobility and the class gap.
1. |
Define social class. Explain how cultural capitals reproduce class privilege in education and, work in the UK? Give examples of inequalities exacerbated by recent Covid 19 in the UK? |
The term "social class" refers to a hierarchical structure that divides people or groups into categories according to their level of social, economic, and cultural capital. Upper class, middle class, and working class are the three main social class categories in the UK. Class advantage in school and the workplace is significantly reproduced by cultural capitals including education, knowledge, skills, and social networks. Those from wealthy origins, for instance, have more access to cultural capital, which can result in higher educational achievement and better employment opportunities. |
2. |
Why does the merit argument not enable social mobility and, equal the career ‘trajectories’ in the professions? Discuss by applying theories of class, race and gender inequalities to entry stage and senior management levels in the elite UK professions. |
According to the merit argument, people should be rewarded for their talents and accomplishments rather than their social status. This argument falls short, though, since it ignores the significance of structural disparities like class, race, and gender, which prevent social mobility and equalise career paths in the workforce. The entrance stage and senior management levels of the prestigious UK professions, where people from rich origins have an edge, mirror these disparities. For instance, research indicates that a lack of cultural and social capital prevents people from the working class from entering elite professions. Similar to how coloured people and women are frequently subjected to racism in the workplace, which hinders their ability to advance in their careers. |
Week 8: Migration and race inequality in employment.
1. |
Define the terms migrant and race. Explain the differences between the two. |
A migrant is someone who relocates, either permanently or temporarily, from one nation or region to another. It is a phrase used to define someone's immigration status. |
2. |
Define positive discrimination and positive action? How could positive action policies, eradicate race discrimination for recruitment and promotion in organizations? Provide your suggestions. |
Positive discrimination is the practice of providing preferential treatment to members of a disadvantaged group, in order to address historical inequalities and promote diversity. In contrast, positive action refers to taking initiative to find and eliminate obstacles that keep individuals of underprivileged groups from taking advantage of possibilities in work, education, or other sectors (dundee.ac.uk. 2023). Organizations should implement positive action policies including focused outreach to underrepresented areas, mentorship and training programmes for varied talent, and setting diversity objectives for hiring and promotion to eliminate racial discrimination in recruiting and promotion. Organizations should also work to foster an inclusive culture where all workers feel appreciated and have equal access to chances for advancement. |
Week 9: Age Diversity and inclusion
1. |
Define age discrimination according to the Equality Act, 2010. |
Age discrimination, as defined by the Equality Act of 2010, is when someone is treated unfairly or differently depending on their real or perceived age. This encompasses both direct discrimination, where one person is regarded less favourably than another according to their age, and indirect discrimination where a practise or policy that is applied to all people has an unjustifiably negative effect on a specific age group. The law also shields people from age-related harassment and abuse in connection with complaints or age discrimination lawsuits. Age discrimination is not permitted in the workplace, in schools, or when providing products, services, or performing public duties (Benn, 2020). |
2. |
What are the hidden, invisible age barriers older workers face which lead to discrimination for access to jobs? What HR diversity policies would you recommend to change age discrimination in employment? |
When looking for jobs, older employees may encounter covert and invisible age obstacles. These might include misconceptions about their aptitude for picking up new skills, a reluctance to engage in their education, and ideas that they may have greater expectations for their salaries or be less flexible to emerging technology.
These laws can support inclusive workplace environments that recognise the contributions of all employees, regardless of age, and minimise age discrimination. |
Week 10: LGBT and inclusion and Disability and Neuro-diversity.
1. |
How does the Equality Act 2010 prevent discrimination against LGBT workers? |
Employees in the UK who identify as LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) are protected from discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. The law forbids victimisation, harassment, and direct and indirect discrimination in the workplace and during vocational training on the basis of sexual orientation or gender reassignment. Moreover, it mandates that companies make reasonable modifications in order to meet the requirements of transgender workers. The law guarantees that same-sex couples have the same legal rights as opposite-sex couples by prohibiting discrimination based on marriage or civil partnership status. Generally, the Equality Act of 2010 guarantees that LGBT employees have legal protection from harassment and discrimination at work (Hunt et al., 2019). |
2. |
Define disability. Explain the differences between visible disabilities and invisible disabilities with examples? |
Disability is defined as a physical or mental impairment that significantly and permanently impairs a person's capacity to carry out their usual day-to-day activities. |
Reference list
|
|
|